Multimodal detection in plasma of molecular residual disease (MRD) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
6065 Background: Despite intensive therapy, 30% of patients (pts) with LA-HNSCC relapse. Published data shows that MRD detection during follow up (FU) may predict relapse, e.g. human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in p16+ pts post radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT); or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post surgery. MRD detection using multiple assays after definitive RT/CRT has not been reported. Methods: We enrolled pts with high risk LA-HNSCC (stage III HPV+, III-IVB HPV-) treated with curative intent: surgery ± adjuvant therapy, RT or CRT. Plasma was collected pre-treatment at baseline (B), at 4-6 weeks (FU1) and 8-12 weeks (FU2) post-treatment. RaDaR, a personalized liquid biopsy assay that targets patient specific somatic variants identified in whole exome sequencing (WES) from matched tumor tissue, was used to detect ctDNA, reported as estimated Variant Allele Fraction (eVAF). Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-seq) was used as a tumor naïve assay for ctDNA, reported as mean VAF. HPV sequencing (HPV-seq) in all and digital PCR (dPCR) in p16+ pts were used to detect HPV DNA. Relapse free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier and associations of ctDNA or HPV DNA with RFS using log-rank test. Assays were compared with Spearman correlation. Results: A total of 89 plasma samples from 35 pts were collected prospectively; 32 pts with at least a FU sample were evaluable: 26 had both. Median age was 63 years (34-71). Most pts were stage III HPV + (N = 16, 50%) and received CRT (N = 25, 78%). No pts had clinical or radiological residual disease at FU2. Median FU was 18.3 months (5.1-25.9), there were 7 clinical relapses. RaDar was applied in 17 pts with WES in matched tissue, including 6 with relapse. ctDNA at B was detected in 15/17 (88%). eVAF at B was not associated with RFS (p = 0.98). Two pts relapsed < 1 year after RT/CRT and had eVAF > 0.001% in FU2 sample; lead time to relapse was 100 and 245 days. FU1 sample of a pt who relapsed > 1 year post-CRT was close to the threshold for ctDNA+ with eVAF 0.0001%; lead time was 494 days. Three pts who received CRT relapsed > 500 days from FU2 sample (ctDNA-). CAPP-seq was applied to 29 pts; mean VAF correlated with eVAF at B (r = 0.75) but not at FU. ctDNA+ at FU using CAPP-seq was not associated with RFS (p = 0.25). HPV-seq was applied to 32 pts; specificity and sensitivity was 100% at B. Among p16+ pts with FU sample (N = 15), HPV DNA was detected in 4/4 with relapse and not in those without, predicting shorter RFS (p < 0.01). dPCR detected HPV DNA in 2/4 pts with relapse. HPV-seq and dPCR correlation was high at B (r = 0.99), lower at FU2 (r = 0.66). Conclusions: HPV DNA and ctDNA can be detected in LA-HNSCC before and after definitive therapy. RaDaR but not CAPP-seq may detect MRD in pts who relapse within 1 year after RT/CRT with a significant lead time. HPV-seq may be more sensitive than dPCR to detect HPV DNA in MRD. Validation in an interception study is planned (NCT 04599309 ).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».