Elranatamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Extended follow up and biweekly administration from the MagnetisMM-3 study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
8039 Background: MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) is an open-label, multicenter, registrational phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of elranatamab monotherapy in pts with RRMM; pts naïve to BCMA-directed therapies were enrolled in Cohort A. Methods: Eligible pts were refractory to at least 1 PI, 1 IMiD, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. Pts received SC elranatamab in 28-d cycles with step-up doses of 12 mg on C1D1 and 32 mg on C1D4 followed by 76 mg QW beginning C1D8. Pts treated for 6 cycles and achieving partial response (PR) or better with response persisting ≥2 mo were switched to 76 mg Q2W, 46 and 58 pts are included in the Q2W efficacy and safety analyses, respectively. Results: Overall, 123 pts received elranatamab. Median pt age was 68.0 y (range, 36−89), 63.4% of pts had an ECOG PS ≥1 and median prior lines of therapy was 5.0 (2−22); 96.7% and 42.3% of pts were triple-class- and penta-drug refractory, respectively. At data cutoff (~12 mo after last pt initial dose), the median follow up was 12.8 mo (0.2−22.7); 34.1% of pts remained on treatment. Most common reasons for permanent treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (39.0%) and adverse events (AE; 13.8%). Objective response rate per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 61% (95% CI 51.8−69.6), with 39 (31.7%) pts with complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR); very good partial response (VGPR) and PR were achieved in 29 (23.6%) and 7 (5.7%) pts, respectively. MRD-negativity (threshold 10–5) was achieved by 92.0% (n = 23/25) of evaluable pts. Median duration of response (mDOR) has not been reached (95% CI 12.9−NE) and DOR at 12 mo was 74.1% (95% CI 60.5−83.6). In pts with CR/sCR or VGPR, mDOR was not reached by 12 mo; in pts with PR, mDOR was 5.2 mo (95% CI 1.6−NE). There were 46 responders by BICR who switched to Q2W dosing ≥24 wk prior to the data cut-off; among these pts, 80.4% maintained/improved their response ≥24 wk after the switch. Median progression-free and overall survival have not been reached by 12 mo, and the respective rates (95% CI) at 12 mo were 57.1% (47.2−65.9) and 62.0% (52.8−70.0). Most common Grade 3/4 treatment emergent AEs were hematologic; Grade 3/4 non-hematologic events reported in ≥5% of pts were COVID-pneumonia (10.6%), hypokalemia (9.8%), pneumonia (7.3%), sepsis (6.5%), hypertension (6.5%), ALT increased (5.7%), and SARS-COV-2 test positive (5.7%). Among pts who switched to Q2W dosing, the incidence of Grade 3/4 AEs decreased by > 10% after the switch. Conclusions: Elranatamab remains efficacious and well tolerated in pts with RRMM after > 1 y of follow-up. Updated analysis with a median follow up of ~15 mo, the longest of all phase 2 BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody studies, including the outcome of pts who switched to the Q2W dosing, will be presented. These results support continued elranatamab development for pts with MM. Clinical trial information: NCT04649359 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».