Phase I/II trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab and stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic head and neck carcinoma: Final results.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
6050 Background: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 is now part of first line therapy in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) to metastatic lesions can reduce tumor burden and could be immune-stimulatory. The combination of SBRT with dual-checkpoint blockade with Durvalumab (D, anti-PD-L1) and Tremelimumab (T, anti-CTLA-4) has not previously been tested in HNSCC. We report on the safety and efficacy of this triple treatment combination (TTC) consisting of SBRT sandwiched between cycles of D and T in oligometastatic HNSCC. Methods: This is a phase I/II single arm multi-institutional study powered for 35 patients with oligometatastatic HNSCC (2-10 lesions) (NCT03283605). D (1500 mg) and T (75 mg) were given for 4 monthly cycles, followed by monthly D for 8 monthly cycles. SBRT to 2-5 lesions was administered during cycle 2. The safety of the TTC was the primary endpoint of the phase I and was evaluated through assessment of Grade 3-5 TTC-related adverse events (AE), based on CTCAE (v 4.03). The primary endpoint of the phase II portion was 6-month progression free survival (PFS), with a predetermined 6-month PFS (6moPFS) rate greater than 27% considered as a positive signal to conduct further research on this combination. Results: A total of 33 evaluable patients were recruited (study accrual was interrupted by the COVID pandemic). The table describes patients’ characteristics. Patients had received 1, 2 and 3 prior systemic therapy lines in 48%, 21% and 9% of the cases, including 6 (18%) patients who had received prior anti-PD-1/L1 or anti-CTLA-4 therapies. The median prescribed and maximum SBRT doses were 45 Gy (range: 18-50) and 52.3 Gy (range: 28.1-69) in 3-5 fractions, respectively Fourteen patients (42%) had Grade ≥ 3 AE attributable to D and T. Only 1 patient developed Grade ≥ 3 AE attributable to SBRT. This patient, who had mucosal radionecrosis after re-irradiation and refused surgical debridement and flap reconstruction, specifically developed 2 Grade 3, 1 Grade 4 and 1 Grade 5 AE. Our primary efficacy endpoint, 6moPFS, was 69.7% (95% CI: 55.6-87.3). Median PFS was 11.9 months (6.94-14.5) and median OS was 25.1 months (17.9-28.4). Rates of complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 9%, 21%, 33% and 12%, respectively, with 8 (24%) patients with no evaluable non-SBRT treated lesion. Conclusions: The addition of SBRT to dual-checkpoint inhibition led to 1 (3%) additional patient developing severe AE. Best response rates were encouraging. Our primary efficacy outcome, 6mo PFS was attained and was higher than what was expected in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT03283605 . [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».