Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Examining the period from the founding of New France in the early seventeenth century to the conquest of 1760, People, State, and War presents a study of colonial warriors and warfare that surveys the exercise of state military power and its effects on ordinary people. Resisting the pervasive and overgeneralizing stereotype of “Canadians” as a warrior people, Louise Dechêne draws readers’ attention to the overlapping and all-encompassing reality of perpetual warfare in New France and the uneven and varied demands of war on the diverse members of colonial society, effectively illustrating the relationship between “Canadian” colonists and the ancien régime administration.Published posthumously, People, State, and War represents a lifetime of research. The book is separated into twelve chapters, tracing the events that led to the creation of the colonial militia in 1669 through the militia’s participation in different colonial, imperial, and inter-Indigenous conflicts, including French offensives against the Haudenosaunee in the late seventeenth century, culminating in what Dechêne terms “the Sixteen Year War,” which ended with the conquest of New France. There are immense details about administrative structures, hierarchies, and specific individuals, included in the chapters (2, 3, 4, and 8) that examine moments of conflict, which expertly reconstruct the varied conditions and composition of colonial military forces, that included members of the dispatched Carginan-Salières regiment, and later the Troupes de la Marine, the militia, colonial volunteers, and regular troops, and the crucially important Indigenous allies of the French empire. However, Dechêne also turns her attention in the intersecting chapters to the experiences and attitudes of the habitants and small urban populations who were equally affected by the exigencies of perpetual conflict through policing, forced labor requisitions, and taxation (chapters 6 and 7). In this still fragile colonial world, the military prowess and effectiveness of colonial military men, regardless of imperial objectives and frequently arbitrary measures, relied heavily on French alliances with different and powerful Indigenous allies, who usually outnumbered colonial troops and provided invaluable support in defense of the colony, on the forced labor of colonial peasants who constructed fortifications throughout the Saint Lawrence Valley, and on itinerant fur traders and coureurs de bois, whose familiarity with the pays d’en haut and Ohio Valley proved crucial to the success of French defense strategies. Rather than the well-worn image of an entire “Canadian” population of natural and enthusiastic soldiers, Dechêne emphasizes the diversity of social and individual circumstances among colonists in New France to highlight how different peoples reacted to, participated in, and came to grips with the reality of warfare in New France.Over her entire career, Dechêne recorded unimaginable details, using official correspondence, memoirs, military campaign journals, taxation records, local parish records, and visual sources, including maps, which offer a window into administrative, social, military, diplomatic, religious, and demographic patterns in New France and draw attention to the sometimes conflicting or disconnected but always enduring relationship between the colony and the metropole. Although People, State, and War examines in depth the experiences of French colonists, the constant presence and the invaluable and indisputable role of France’s Indigenous allies in military campaigns and in the colony’s defense and survival remains constant throughout Dechêne’s analysis. Contributing to the ongoing movement away from past scholarly conclusions that have overlooked or underacknowledged the role of Indigenous peoples in the growth, development, and protection of France’s overseas colonies, Dechêne situates the Indigenous inhabitants of North America as the principal military force of New France (118). Presenting a combined examination of government and societal structures, military hierarchies, and colonial conflicts, interwoven with tantalizing details about diverse peoples, specific military campaigns, diplomatic negotiations, and individual reactions and responses to changing imperial regulations, demands, and objectives in the colony, People, State, and War is an indispensable resource for scholars of New France.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».