MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379388861 · doi:10.1242/jeb.245012

Hot hearts can beat faster when meat is on the menu

2023· article· en· W4379388861 sur OpenAlexaff
Giulia S. Rossi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiquePhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Établissements canadiensThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEctothermOmnivoreBiologyEcologyHerbivoreBrineZoologyFisheryBrine shrimpPredationChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As our planet continues to warm, biologists are sweating over how animals will cope with the changing climate. For cold-blooded animals (ectotherms), high environmental temperatures pose a particular problem because their body temperature closely matches that of their surroundings. Imagine being unable to turn down your house's thermostat when outside temperatures get blisteringly hot – yikes! To make matters worse, the heat accelerates many vital physiological processes in ectotherms, including heart rate. Because hearts can only beat so fast while maintaining a proper rhythm, there are limits to the temperature that ectothermic animals can tolerate. But, if these animals can find ways to increase their maximum heart rate, allowing their hearts to keep pumping at temperatures that would otherwise prove fatal, they may gain an advantage in a warming world. In a fascinating new study led by Emily Hardison from the University of California, Santa Barbara, USA, a team of researchers tested whether diet can help ectothermic opaleye (Girella nigricans) regulate their hearts better at high temperatures.Opaleye are small fish commonly found in the rocky shallows along the west coast of North America, and their generalist diet allows them to choose between eating plants and/or animals to meet their nutritional requirements: a herbivorous diet is rich in antioxidants and minerals, while a carnivorous diet is packed with proteins and fats. To understand how these different diets might impact opaleye heart function, the researchers first maintained fish at 12°C and fed them a carnivorous (brine shrimp), herbivorous (algae) or omnivorous (algae and brine shrimp) diet for 2 weeks. Next, they exposed the fish to temperatures ranging from approximately 12°C to 34°C and monitored how fast their hearts were beating at each 1°C increment. To make sure the fish were giving it their all, the researchers gave them a little boost with two different drugs to encourage their hearts to beat as fast as possible.The team found that maximum heart rate was similar between all fish, despite being fed different diets. The fish's heart rates increased with rising temperature, reaching a peak of 150 beats min−1 at approximately 28°C. So, the researchers decided to take their study one step further and see whether the fish could modify how their hearts work after prolonged exposure to a high temperature. This time the researchers warmed the fish up to 20°C for 2 weeks while feeding them the same carnivorous, herbivorous or omnivorous diets. After the hot tub-like experience, the team measured each fish's maximum heart rate across the same range of temperatures. Interestingly, the meat-eating fish (carnivorous and omnivorous diets) now had a higher maximum heart rate at 28°C than they did before. Herbivorous fish, in contrast, had the exact same maximum heart rate as before, indicating that they were not able to adjust to the warming climate. It turns out that a little bit of meat on the menu allowed the fish's hearts to beat faster in the heat – an adjustment that might make them more heat tolerant overall.Hardison and her colleagues then pondered why the opaleye on a meat-based diet could handle the heat better. Maybe it's what's on the menu that counts? After all, meaty meals are usually high in fatty acids, which serve as tiny building blocks for many cellular structures in the body. The researchers analyzed the fatty acid composition of the fish's hearts and, as expected, the meat-eaters had a fatty acid composition better suited to high temperatures. Now, this doesn't mean that people should start devouring sirloin steak in the name of thermal tolerance, but it does suggest that a balanced diet might just give animals an edge against the elements in our rapidly warming world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,145

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0430,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental Biology→Même sujetPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→Travaux en français237 207→