MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379409693 · doi:10.1353/see.2023.a897298

Superfluous Women: Art, Feminism, and Revolution in Twenty-First-Century Ukraine by Jessica Zychowicz (review)

2023· article· en· W4379409693 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal Economic and Social Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeminismUkrainianGender studiesSociologySexual revolutionPolitical scienceHistoryHuman sexualityPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Superfluous Women: Art, Feminism, and Revolution in Twenty-First-Century Ukraine by Jessica Zychowicz Kathleen Mitchell-Fox Zychowicz, Jessica. Superfluous Women: Art, Feminism, and Revolution in Twenty-First-Century Ukraine. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Buffalo, NY and London, 2020. xx + 399 pp. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $93.00. In Superfluous Women, Jessica Zychowicz presents a detailed interpretation of the protest and countercultural activities of Ukraine's inter-revolutionary generation, the generation who came of age in the decade between the Orange Revolution (2004–05) and Euromaidan (2013–14). Zychowicz's title is an ironic reference to the lishnii chelovek of nineteenth-century Russia. In her usage, it alludes to the initial dismissive response towards the feminist and anti-establishment movements as a superfluous generation protesting for protest's sake. Thus, the aim of Superfluous Women is two-fold: firstly, to demonstrate and decode the significance of inter-revolutionary protest in Ukraine, thereby reclaiming its 'superfluous women'; secondly, to provide a nuanced perspective on Ukrainian art and protest between 2004–14. The latter balances the decentring of Western liberal assumptions that all protest is a cry for closer European ties with a renegotiation of the Soviet past's relevance to the 'decommunizing' present. From the start, Zychowicz positions herself as a peer of the inter-revolutionary generation, united with them not only by time or space, but by the problem of navigating a Soviet past they did not experience but that remains a part of their lives and symbolic economies. Zychowicz writes: 'Each of us has found ourselves at a crossroads with no signposts' (p. 3). Superfluous Women represents an innovative work which illuminates the multiple crossroads that inhabitants and scholars of the post-Communist political, aesthetic and physical landscape must confront. These intersecting pathways are illustrated [End Page 171] with apt theoretical, analytical and primary source materials, accompanied by thorough visual examples. Superfluous Women is as much about Ukraine as it is about protest. While many of the questions posed in the text's introduction are those broadly associated with the study of protest (the commodification of protest, the instantiation of a public, the intersection of feminism and nationalism, and the degree to which art and activism are connected), these questions are always couched in the local context of Ukraine, Kyiv or Maidan Nezalezhnosti. Throughout Superfluous Women, Zychowicz examines the public square (Maidan) as both a physical landscape that enables protest, and the abstract potential public to whom it gives voice. The public square represents continuity not just between the Orange Revolution and Euromaidan, but between all the groups and individuals under discussion. Who occupies Zychowicz's 'square'? The first two chapters are dedicated to the best-known and most controversial feminist group since Ukraine's independence, Femen (2008–13). Of these chapters, the first dissects Femen's topless protests as a parodic strategy critiquing the fetishization of individuality on the Eastern front. Zychowicz stresses the dangers of parody, and her second chapter exposes the realization of these anxieties, detailing Femen's aesthetic shift into a problematic portrayal of Islam. In this chapter, Zychowicz also provides crucial insight into the relationship between protest and commodification by examining the exchanges between Femen and Pussy Riot, which have, so far, largely been neglected by scholars. In her third chapter, Zychowicz turns to the largest Ukrainian feminist group since 1991, Ofenzywa (2009–14), giving a close reading of the visual strategies of the affiliated artist Yevgenia Belorusets. Zychowicz compares Belorusets's photography with that of the Soviet Avant-Garde pioneer, Aleksandr Rodchenko, examining how the shift between a Soviet belief in the capacity of space to create political subjectivity and the impetus for post-Communist subjectivities to mould old Soviet space is articulated aesthetically. The problems and possibilities posed by the Soviet past are explored further in the fourth chapter's discussion of HudRada and REP. Here, Zychowicz emphasizes that unofficial Ukrainian art is more than a third Avant-Garde, by concentrating on the fetishization of the public square as a manifestation of freedom as negative space. The final chapter concerns contemporary artists such as Vlad Ralko and Alevtyna Kakhidze, who appropriate the Soviet aesthetic legacy and symbolic...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,135
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle