MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379413689 · doi:10.1353/see.2019.0061

Conversations with Vladimir Nabokov by Golla Robert (review)

2019· article· en· W4379413689 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiscourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPityIndex (typography)LiteratureSelection (genetic algorithm)HistoryPhilosophyArt historyClassicsSociologyArtComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SEER, 97, 3, JULY 2019 544 Übermensch, ideas about pity, and conception of the otherworld as ‘materially continuous with this one’ (p. 139) effectively revise or reinterpret Nietzsche’s philosophy. In this way, Rodgers showcases not only how Nietzsche can help us be good readers of Nabokov’s books, but also how Nabokov provokes us to rethink concepts taken for granted in Nietzsche’s philosophy. Department of Language and Literature Laci Mattison Florida Gulf Coast University Golla, Robert (ed.). Conversations with Vladimir Nabokov. Literary Conversations Series. University Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, 2017. xvii + 237 pp. Chronology. Index. $60.00: £55.95. Conversations with Nabokov is a new collection of twenty-eight interviews spanning the years 1958 to 1977. Many readers will have thought that Nabokov’s 1973 volume — Strong Opinions — represented an exhaustive selection of the best examples, but here we have material that pre- and post-dates it, and which also includes a number of previously uncollected pieces. This is not to say that thisnewmaterialisoflittlesignificance.Onthecontrary,muchofitrevealsafar more personable and relaxed figure, less controlling, less elusive, and therefore more exposed. As a collection, it of course does not replace Strong Opinions, but serves as a very valuable addition and complement to it, filling gaps in the existing interviews and adding new dimensions to our understanding of contemporary responses to the man and his work. Some interviews from Strong Opinions are included — for example, Peter Duvall-Smith for the BBC in 1962 and Alvin Toffler for Playboy, 1964. Alfred Appel’s 1967 interview is printed in full for the first time, although the additions are few, whilst James Mossman’s 1969 interview for the BBC which Nabokov reproduced from his ‘final typescript’ (Strong Opinions, New York, 1973, p. 141), is taken from the version in The Listener, which although is not as complete, does have a couple of amusing additions. All the rest of the material, covering 1958–62 and 1971–77, is new. Nabokov was notorious for finding interviews difficult. He did not care for the spontaneity of a question and answer exchange, was uncomfortable with speaking ‘off the Nabocuff’ (Strong Opinions, p. 62; Conversations, p. 175), and did not allow interviews to be taped. Instead, he preferred to see the questions in advance so that he could prepare his answers on paper, which has established his reputation for being overly formal and inhibited in conversation. Herbert Gold, however, viewed Nabokov’s claim to need to adopt this formula because of ‘his unfamiliarity with English’ as ‘a constant seriocomic form of teasing’ REVIEWS 545 (p. 143). ‘[H]is frequent apologies for his grasp of English clearly belong in the context of Nabokov’s special mournful joking: he means it, he does not mean it, he is grieving for his loss [of Russian], he is outraged if anyone criticizes his style, he pretends to be just a poor lonely foreigner, he is as American “as April in Arizona”’ (pp. 143–44). In interviews nearly twenty years apart, the impact of having to abandon his Russian for English seems to magnify, rather than diminish. In a 1959 interview, Nabokov describes the switch in terms of a move ‘from a darkened house to another on a starless night during a strike of candle makers and torchbearers. After a period of panic and groping, I managed to settle down rather comfortably’ (p. 35). In 1977, however, in a piece published shortly after his death taken from a meeting only a few months before, Nabokov describes his having to start writing in English as ‘exceedingly painful, like learning anew to handle things after losing seven or eight fingers in an explosion’ (p. 215). Unlike Strong Opinions, many of the pieces collected here are not conventional interviews, but magazine articles — accounts of visits to the Nabokovs in New York, London or Montreux, butterfly hunting in the Grand Canyon or the Swiss mountains, conversations with ‘the tweedy host’ (p. 184) over lunch, dinner or coffee. There is a full transcription of the 1958 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s television special with Nabokov and Lionel Trilling discussing Lolita. Various essays offer rare glimpses of an unguarded Nabokov: at Cornell, ‘slouching comfortably in his armchair’ (p. 18); in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,519
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle