MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379417154 · doi:10.1353/lvn.2013.a508053

All Astir

2013· article· en· W4379417154 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLeviathan · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOperaArtArt historyPerformance artPrivilege (computing)Visual artsHumanitiesLiteratureComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

All Astir Samuel Otter On October 10, 2012, the opera Moby-Dick, with music by Jake Heggie and libretto by Gene Scheer, had its San Francisco premiere, the first of eight performances at the War Memorial Opera House. The opera was first performed in Dallas in 2010 and then traveled to Adelaide (Australia), Calgary, and San Diego. I had the privilege of leading a panel discussion with the composer and librettist at Berkeley on the afternoon following opening night. I was joined by Robert K. Wallace (whose book Heggie and Scheer's Moby-Dick: A Grand Opera for the 21st Century, with photographs by Karen Almond, will be published in April) and John Kapusta of the Music Department at Berkeley. Among other topics, we discussed the allure and the challenge of translating Moby-Dick to other forms of art, the ways in which Melville's book is and is not "operatic," the collaborative process, the choices made in moving from book to opera (such as setting the opera entirely at sea, having the action unfold in the present rather than in retrospect, and centering on the relationships between Ahab and Starbuck, Ishmael and Queequeg), and the composition of the vocal parts. The Moby-Dick opera is a compelling work of art in its own right and also a remarkable meditation on Melville's book. As I sportively proposed at the Berkeley discussion, the opera's creators have made Moby-Dick into a better novel than Melville did, if by "better novel" we mean a work with more focused plotting, symmetrical form, and sustained character development. Heggie and Scheer help us to see more clearly the story embedded in Moby-Dick about leaders and followers, fathers and sons, and the lost and the found, and their version alerts us to the novelistic satisfactions that Melville's book withholds, pressing us to think further about its intricate and multiple forms. They spoke eloquently about their collaboration, their fascinations with Moby-Dick, and the art and business of opera. If you would like to see a taped version of the Berkeley discussion, you can find it on the web at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PASr2g21ORs. You also can hear the opera set designer, Robert Brill, talk about his search for the most effective ways to represent the ship and the whale, with the aid of production slides; his presentation occurred during another event last October linked to the San Francisco opera premiere, this one at the California Academy of Sciences: http://video.calacademy.org/details/547. The opera has been filmed in San Francisco for broadcast on the PBS "Great Performances" series this year or next, and releases are planned on CD and DVD. [End Page 96] "Moby-Dick is everywhere," declared Nina Martyris in an October Huffington Post article. "Moby-Dick breaches ubiquitous at this moment," announced George Cotkin in a November blog at the Chronicle of Higher Education. (You can find the pieces at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nina-martyris/thar-she-blows-everywhere_b_1989920.html and http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2012/11/13/moby-dick-in-the-mainstream/.) The Heggie and Scheer opera is only one recent instance of a phenomenon—the resonance of Melville's book in U.S. culture—that continues to fascinate and currently is surging (and invites explanation). The first New York City marathon reading of Moby-Dick occurred Nov. 16-18 (commemorating the first U. S. publication on Nov. 14, 1851) at three independent bookstores: WORD, in Greenpoint, Brooklyn; Housing Works Bookstore and Cafe, in Soho; and Molasses Books, in Bushwick, Brooklyn. We include in this issue's "Extracts" a report from Aaron Calvin on the events. The New York Marathon joins, of course, the annual reading marathons in Mystic Seaport, Conn., and New Bedford, Mass. (more on the latter below). In late January, after 135 days, the web "Moby-Dick Big Read" concluded with a reading of the book's "Epilogue" by the poet Mary Oliver. Over more than four months, each of the book's chapters was read aloud and broadcast online in a series of downloads, free and accessible to the public at http://www. mobydickbigread.com/. Organized by Philip...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,652
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,179
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle