MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379424111 · doi:10.1353/see.2003.0160

Novye materialy o L. N. Tolstom. Iz arkhiva N. N. Guseva by A. A. s> Donskov Z. N. Ivanova , L. D. Gromova (review)

2003· article· hr· W4379424111 sur OpenAlex
R. F. Christian

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languehr
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiscourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSlavic languagesHumanitiesArtClassicsLibrary scienceArt historyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS 309 few cases, French)versions of all the extended and most of the shorterprose quotations given in the text. Helfant's monograph shows familiarity with secondary literature in a number of fieldsand has a solid scholarlyapparatus.The chapterson Tolstoi the American and Begichev, which provide interestinginsightson these little known individuals, are particularly useful. However, the merits of the monograph may be outweighedby defects in balance, selection of material, and disparitybetween sub-title and content that arise, one suspects, from the difficultyof transformingthe narrowlyfocused postgraduate dissertation on which the monograph is no doubt based into an altogethermore ambitious project. Department ofRussian Studies DEREK OFFORD University ofBristol Donskov, A. A. (ed.); Ivanova, Z. N. and Gromova, L. D. (comps). Novye materiayo L. N Tolstom. Iz ark/ivaN N Guseva. Tolstoy Series, 4. Slavic Research Group at the University of Ottawa and the L. N. Tolstoy Museum, Moscow, Ottawa and Moscow, 2002. Xii + 282 pp. Illustrations . Notes. Indexes. CAN$24.oo (paperback). THIS volume is the latest in the series of publications, undertakenjointly by the Slavic Research Group of the University of Ottawa, the State Tolstoi Museum in Moscow and the Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, which focus on Tolstoi towards the end of his life. It is the second to draw exclusively on previously unpublishedmaterialsfrom the vast archiveof N. N. Gusev, bequeathed to the Tolstoi Museum afterhisdeath in I967. Compiled by two outstanding Tolstoi scholarsin Russia, and edited in Ottawa by the foremost Tolstoi specialist in Canada, this latest volume consists of forty-five letters from Gusev to Tolstoi during the period of 1903-19 10 (Tolstoi'sreplieshave alreadybeen published),and eight reminiscences of Tolstoi, two by the same author. Nikolai Gusev, son of an icon painter and grandson of a serf, was Tolstoi's secretary from I907- I909, and subsequently Director of the Tolstoi Museum in Moscow during the late I920s. He is known to Tolstoi scholarsthroughout the world for his lifelong devotion to Tolstoi as biographer, memoirist and editor. Many of the letterspublishedhere were writtenin the remote village of Korepino in the Perm' Province, where he had been exiled for circulating banned writings of Tolstoi. They provide some interesting details of his not too uncomfortable life there, his living conditions and leisure pursuits, his captors and fellow exiles 'fortunatelythere are no intelligentyamong them', he remarked as well as revealing the nature and extent of his reading, and the overwhelming impact on him of Tolstoi's ideas. He welcomed his new situation as an opportunity to serve God. His best friend in captivity, he claimed, was Tolstoi's Cycle ofReadings. WhatIsArt?had rescued him from the baleful influence of Marxistdogma. But some readersmay be embarrassedby Gusev's constant adulation in these letters of his 'unforgettableand priceless teacher and friend', which borders at times on idolatry:Tolstoi's every word, 310 SEER, 8i, 2, 2003 however insignificant,is invaluable;he has taken upon himself the burden of the sinsof the whole world;did he know that he had recentlybeen proclaimed 'the only Christian in the world'? One would like to know more about the later Gusev than can be gleaned from Ivanova's brief biographical introduction . Did he remain unswervingly loyal to Tolstoi's ideals, a conscientious objector, a teetotaller,a vegetarian?Did he ever sufferfor his beliefsin Soviet times? Could he really have been the sanctimonious individual of limited cultural and intellectual interests as described by a woman acquaintance of his to the presentreviewer?A fullerbiographyof thisindefatigablebiographer would be welcome. The reminiscences of Tolstoi which follow Gusev'sletterstake up approximately i 00 pages. The seven contributors come from widely different educational backgrounds:three Iasnaia Poliana employees on the land or in the household; two teachers; one amateur photographer and one recent universitygraduate.Virtuallyall of their accounts referto the period of I889; some were written much later than the events described;at one extreme the peasant Morozov had known Tolstoi for most of his life, while the photographer only met him once. In contrast to Gusev's letters, the focus of attention in these memoirs is Tolstoi the man ratherthan Tolstoi the author. One is constantly made aware of Tolstoi's kindness,considerationfor others, and ability...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,194
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle