MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379426476 · doi:10.1353/see.2006.0170

Nationalism and the Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons by M. Gijsberts, L. Hagendoorn and P. Scheepers, and: Migration in the New Europe: East-West Revisited by A. Górny and P. Ruspini (review)

2006· article· en· W4379426476 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Pittaway

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal trade and economics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNationalismLatin AmericansEthnic groupIndex (typography)Value (mathematics)Economic historyPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryAnthropologyPoliticsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I84 SEER, 84, I, 2oo6 recruitedby Myrdaland Nicholas Kaldor (thefirstHead of ResearchDivision) in the 1940s: they and no fewer than half the other economists of that vintage which the chapter singles out continued productive work for the rest of the century (Tibor Barna, Karl Brunner,Hal Lary,AlfredMaizels, Rudolf Notel and Robert Neild). The present reviewer,who was part of the team between 195I and I963, recallsthe intellectualatmosphereas that of an international universitywith the added value of research missions to the Soviet republics and statesof EasternEurope, then virtuallyclosed to Westernacademics. Commending publications of all five UN regional commissions, the volume's authors the others are Adebayo Adedeji on that for Africa, Blandine Destremau on that for Western Asia, Gert Rosenthal on that for Latin America and the Caribbean, and Leelananda da Silva on that for Asia and the Pacific review established, and furnishnovel, methodologies and analyses in the broad field of development economics and policies. Among their Secretariatswas another Executive Secretary whose achievements the book sagaciously acknowledges, the founding head of the (then) Economic CommissionforLatinAmerica,RauilPrebisch,who reinterpretedthecomplex issues of development into concrete measures which governments could practicallyimplement. Prebischsought to modify the divisionbetween North and South,just as Myrdalstruggledwith thatbetween Eastand West. University ofBirmingham MICHAEL KASER andStAntony's College, Oxford Gijsberts, M., Hagendoorn, L. and Scheepers, P. (eds). Nationalism andthe Exclusionof Migrants:Cross-National Comparisons. Research in Migration and Ethnic Relations Series. Ashgate, Aldershot and Burlington, VT, 2004. xvi + 296 pp. Tables. Figures. Notes. Appendices. Bibliography. Index.?49 95G6rny , A. and Ruspini, P. (eds).Migration intheNewEurope. East-West Revisited. Migration, Identities and Citizenship. PalgraveMacmillan, Basingstoke and New York, 2004. xx + 283 pp. Tables. Figures. Maps. Appendix. Notes. Bibliographicreferences.Index. ?45.??. THE issues of migration have become a flashpoint of controversy and a hot political issue of many European states. During the I990S frequent scares about migration from the post-socialiststatesof Central and EasternEurope have come to influence emotive debates about immigration into Western Europe. These debates have reached boiling point with the first wave of eastern enlargement of the European Union, which had triggered scares many of them totally unfounded -about the possibility of widespread economic migration from the new members into Western Europe. The political impact of such fearshave been considerable,fuellingthe exceptional performance of, for example, the right-wing populist United Kingdom Independence Party in the 2004 elections to the European parliament, or provided some of the backdropto the 2005 Frenchand Dutch rejectionsof the constitutionof the European Union. REVIEWS I85 What is more interesting, perhaps, is what such Western European fears show about the mechanisms through which mental borders between an 'eastern' and a 'western' Europe are being reinforced in the identities of European citizens a decade-and-a-half after the end of the Cold War, when the assumption, by some of the Central and Eastern European states of EU membership,is supposedto have unifiedthe continent. Unfortunately,neither of the two books under review addresses this question directly, though it is raisedby Agata Gorny and Paolo Ruspini in the introductionto theirvolume, and by some of their contributors,most notably by EdwardA. Tiryakan,in a stimulating essay on the difficulties and challenges in shaping a notion of European identity in a post-enlargement European Union, that is sufficiently encompassing to make the process of expansion 'culturally manageable'. Gorny and Ruspini's collection of essays as a whole, however, ends up suffering from some of the major shortcomings of this genre of academic publication its content is simplytoo uneven to make a majorcontribution. Furthermore,it has not been greatlyhelped by a lack of conceptual clarityon the part of the editors, as to the purpose of the volume. It mixes the resultsof veryspecificresearchinto the sociologyofmigrationinparticulargeographical contexts, with more theoretical observations, together with explicit policy prescriptions.As a consequence the volume is hampered by a basic lack of clarityabout the questionswhich its contributorshave been askedto address. Gijsbert, Hagendoorn and Scheepers's volume, however, does not suffer from this shortcoming. It is the major outcome of a substantialcollaborative researchprojecton the relationshipbetween nationalidentitiesand exclusionary attitudes towards other in twenty-two countries, that include the most significantCentral and Eastern European countries, selected Western European states,aswell as the United States,Canada, Australia,New Zealand...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,248
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,536

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetGlobal trade and economicsTravaux en français237 207