MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379427390 · doi:10.1353/see.2007.0043

Bridging the European Divide: Middle Power Politics and Regional Security Dilemmas by Joshua B. s> Spero (review)

2007· article· en· W4379427390 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Korosteleva

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Politics and Security
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsForeign policyPresidencyPower (physics)Political scienceBridging (networking)Middle powerHistoriographySociologyPublic administrationLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

i88 SEER, 85, I, 2007 However, superficialflaws scarcelydetractfrom the fact that this book fills an important gap in the literatureon Russian politics. While the institutional development of both the presidency and the parliamenthas been the subject of book-lengthstudiesthe governmenthas largelybeen neglected, presumably due to its perceived unimportance in policy-making, especially under PresidentPutin. Nevertheless,such studiesare importantnot only because the government has at times exercised considerable discretionarypolicy-making powers, but also because they contributeto our broaderunderstandingof the relationshipbetween federalinstitutionsover time, and indeed into the future. Furthermore,the encyclopedic empirical detail will make the work a useful point of referencefor specialistsand postgraduatestudents,while the theoretical frameworkshould attractthe attention of comparativescholars,especially those interestedin understandingthe dynamicsof governmentdevelopmentin other president-parliamentarysystems such as those in Lithuania, Moldova and Ukraine. Department ofPoliticsandInternational Relations SARAH WHITMORE Oxford Brookes University Spero,Joshua B. Bridging theEuropean Divide:MiddlePowerPoliticsandRegional Securi Dilemmas.Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, Toronto and Oxford, 2004. viii +343 pp. Illustration.Notes. Bibliography.Index. C57.00? THISbook makes an importantcontributionto the field of securityand power politics focusing on Poland's success and difficulties in defining adequate foreign policy-making in the transforming Europe. The book provides an illuminatingstudy of how a novel other-help alignment strategv devised and methodically promulgatedby the then ForeignMinisterKrysztofSkubiszewskiand his dynamic ministerial team helped Poland to generate and subsequently maintain and influence the power balance in the post-Cold War Europe and the world. Not only has the book excelled in providing a thorough historiographical analysisof Poland's foreign policy-makingbetween I989 and 1993, but it also recognized a monumental effort of the longest lasting postCommunist minister Skubiszewskiin prioritizingsovereigny as a key objective of a newly independent state, and through its painstaking implementation bestowing to the nation an increased security and internationalcooperation. As a result, despite its limited geopolitical options, Poland has grown to become an influentialplayer in European and world politics. The great advantage of the book is its logical and impeccable structure affording concise and relevant summation of individual chapters and providing an extended comprehensive conclusion to the whole book. This undoubtedly helps the reader to follow the author's logic from its inception and author's reiterations of the key points in bringing the argument to its culmination. In the firsttwo chaptersthe author lays down some historicaland conceptual foundationsfor the subsequentexplorationof the 'middle power politics' REVIEWS I89 theory in practice. Dr Spero attests various international relations theories to the case of Poland and arrives at the conclusion that a novel 'bridging' strategicforeign policy-makingthat Poland effectivelyadopted in early postCommunist days, has become a more expedient strategythan a conventional balancing or bandwagoning approachto relations-buildingwith greatpowers. He contends that Poland has succeeded at becoming a pivotal middle power state because it can now affect regional security dilemmas and influence 'how great powers might choose to transform the anarchical international system' (p. 23). Although the concept of middle power politics and various other-help strategiesassociatedwith it receive sufficientattentionby the author, the actual elaboration of the concept of pivotalmiddle powersremains under explored and in need of furtherclarification. The book has clearly benefited from an in-depth survey of domestic and internationalfactorsthat conditioned Poland'sracja stanuin foreignpolicymaking in chapters 3-5. Particularlyinformative is the account of Poland's relations-buildingwith an integrating Germany and a disintegratingUSSR, in the process of which some classic self-help strategies were tried and abandoned, and a more effectivestrategyof bilateral'bridging'was eventually found to help overcome centuries-old security dilemmas and make Poland matter to great powers these days. The author also provides a substantive analysisof Poland'salignmentstrategiestowardsCentraland EasternEurope, demonstrating its leading role in forging a European path for many post-Communist states. Additionally, the increasinglyimportant contribution of Poland to democracy-buildingin the EU's outsiderstates, such as Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, is thoroughly elucidated by the author. On the side of criticism, perhaps, one could mention that a more balanced approach could have been adopted to illustratethe bi-lateral nature of these agreements, to avoid over-emphasisingthe role Poland played in facilitatinga European future for many new post-Communist states. Furthermore, Belarus is only briefly alluded to in chapter four. In the meantime, Poland's endeavour to develop a reciprocal dialogue...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,496
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetEuropean Politics and SecurityTravaux en français237 207