Galicia: A Multicultural Land by Christopher Hann , Paul Robert Magocsi (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
REVIEWS 365 Hann, Christopher and Magocsi, Paul Robert(eds). Galicia: A Multicultural Land. University of Toronto Press,Toronto, ON, Buffalo,NY and London, 2006. ix + 259 pp. Map. Illustrations. Notes. Index. $35.00:£20.00 (paperback). The articles collected inthisvolumewereoriginally presented at a conference on Galicia, held in May 1998 at the University of Ârhus,Denmark.The elevenspecialists fromvariousacademic disciplines and different countries represented herehavemadeimportant contributions tothehistory ofGalicia overthelastfifteen years.In thisrespect thevolumesummarizes largely recent historical and cultural researchon Galicia,together withCzaplicka'srecent collection ofarticles on thehistory ofLwów/Lviv (John Czaplicka[ed.],Lviv: A City inthe Crosscurrents ofCulture, HarvardUkrainian Studies, 24,Cambridge, MA, 2002).As suchthepublication is verywelcome. Paul RobertMagocsi,co-editor of thevolumeand an authorof a wellknowngeneralhistory ofUkraine,outlines in hisintroduction threeaspects whichcharacterize the regionand whichhe considersas veryhelpfulfor itsunderstanding: first, tradeand commerceand mostimportantly Galicia's economicdeclinein thenineteenth century; secondly, itsethnicdiversity (he namesparticularly the Jews, Ukrainians, Poles,GermansandArmenians) and, thirdly, the Habsburgheritage, above all 'mutualconflicting claimsto the sameterritory' (p. 15)and Ukrainian patriotism. Magocsiidentifies Galiciaas historic Galicia,whichmeanspre-1772 and EasternGalicia. Takingtheintroductory remarks as a guideline forthevolumeone has to makesomereservations. Firstly, ifwe identify Galicia as historic Galicia and excludefromit thehistory ofWesternGalicia (in thisvolumeKai Struve's articleon 'Peasantsand Patriotic Celebrations in HabsburgGalicia' is the onlyexceptionin thisrespect) thenone mighthave expectedto see several contributions on Galicia's pre-1772 history in the volume.Yet onlyJerzy Motylewicz's discussion ofthevariousethnic communities inthetownsofthe Polish-Ukrainian borderland hasa clearfocuson thepre-nineteenth centuries. Secondly, ifethnicdiversity is a specific marker oftheregion, and bearingin mindthetitleofthevolume('a multicultural land'),thenone is disappointed by thefactthatthevolumecontainsonlyarticleson Ukrainian-Polish and Orthodox-Catholic relations. Jews,who constituted an important part of Galicia's populationover manycenturies and whose history/ histories has receivedconsiderable attention in the 1990s,are hardlyrepresented (JohnPaul Himka'scompetent overview ofGalicia'sreligious diversity treats them at leastto someextent). Mostarticles focuson variousaspectsofGalicia'shistory inthenineteenth and thefirst halfofthetwentieth century as one might have expected.The Polishhistorian Stanislaw Stçpienreminds us abouttheimportant rolewhich Przemysl - and particularly itsGreekCatholicChurch- hasplayedin the earlynineteenth century forthe'Rutheniannationalawakening' (p. 55).The Ukrainianhistorian Volodymyr Potul'nyts'kyi approachesthe questionof Galicianidentity at theturnofthetwentieth century withintheUkrainian context bycomparing twoimagesfrom Ukrainians from outsideGalicia and twoimagesfrom within Galicia.Although hisconclusion is notveryoriginal, thatallfour'regarded Galiciaas partofa single Ukrainian patrimony' (p.97), 366 SEER, 87, 2, APRIL 200g the approachmakesquite interesting reading.The articleby the German historian Kai Struveon thepatriotic celebrations of Polishand Ukrainian peasantsis one of thefinest in thevolume.He comparesUkrainiancommemorations of the abolitionof peasantserfdom and theirtransformation intonational festivals sincetheendofthenineteenth century and Polishpeasant pilgrimages whichfulfilled a rathersimilar- national- aim. Anna VeronikaWendland analysesthe nationalization of the public spherein interwar Lviv.The nationalization ofwar memories dividedand segregated theurbanpublicspherealong nationallinesand she stresses thatrumours playeda keyrolein their making. The volumeconcludes withthreearticles on Galicia'smorerecent history, thetimeperiodafterthecollapseof Communism in EasternEurope.The British geographer Luiza Bialasiewiczfocuseson the questionof how discourse on the Habsburg legacy has shaped discourseon the region's Europeanbelonging.She is particularly interested in the Polish-Ukrainian 'geographical imaginary' oftheregionaimedatpresenting thisborderland 'as a historical spaceofcoexistence and contentment' (p. 163).The Lvivhistorian Yaroslav Hrytsak analysesthe phenomenonof regionalism in Galicia. He tracesUkrainian nationalization oftheregion's history backtothe1860s,and pointsto selective forgetting withrespect to otherethno-confessional groups and to thedevelopment ofa rather exclusive Ukrainiannationalidentity in theregionin thetwentieth century, itself mostprobablya result oftherival Polishnationalnarrative. Contemporary Galicia is peripheral in Ukrainein manywaysand youngintellectuals from theregionhaveresponded recently to thisprocessby claiming somekindofautonomy forGalicia. The British anthropologist ChrisHann examines theentanglement oftheGreekCatholic ChurchwithUkrainian nationalism inthenineteenth and twentieth centuries in Przemys'l - whichaccording to hisanalysis alienatedsomeofthefaithful fromthechurch- and thestruggle fora new multiculturalism in thecity after 1991, whichhas stilltobe established. The volume,whichcontainsa map of Galicia and an index,convinces onlypartially: whilemostofthearticles arewellresearched, argueclearly and thusdeserve attention, thegeneralstructure ofthepublication does notmeet theexpectations whichone mighthave had on openingthebook. Paul R. Magocsi is certainly right withhis advice thattheeconomichistory of the regionshouldbe takenmoreseriously intoconsideration. Historisches Seminar G. Hausmann AlbertLudwigs Universität Freiburg Bitis,Alexander.RussiaandtheEastern Question: Army, Government, andSociety 1815-1833. A British AcademyPostdoctoral Fellowship Monograph.The British Academyand OxfordUniversity Press,Oxford, 2006.xxiii+ 542 pp. Maps. Notes.Bibliography. Index.£75.00. The EasternQuestioninRussianstudies has curiously slippedoff theagenda ofmuchmodernscholarship oflate,thelastmajorstudies in thisarea being byM. E. Yapp andM. S. Anderson inthe1960sand 1970s. Itperhaps became ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».