MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379434269 · doi:10.1353/see.2007.0114

Literaturnye ob"edineniia Moskvy i Peterburga 1890-1917 godov. Slovar' by Manfred Shruba (review)

2007· article· en· W4379434269 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. L. Drage

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRussian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSalonPoliticsScholarshipHistoryClassicsQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyReligious studiesLiteratureArt historyArtLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I44 SEER, 85, I, 2007 thisreviewer.Others - particularlythose loyal to one of the many established 'religious' interpretations of Dostoevskii will find the thesis too radical. Jones's scholarship justifiably retains a central place in English-language Dostoevskii studies. But this book ought also to affect the critical and sometimes not too critical work being done on Dostoevskii in his own country. School of Slavonic andEastEuropean Studies DEREK BROWER UniversivCollege London Shruba, Manfred. Literaturnye ob"edineniia Moskvyi Peterburga I890-I9I7 godov. Slovar'. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, 2004. 440 pp. Illustrations.Appendix. Indexes. Price unknown. THE last quarter of the nineteenth century and the years up to the October Revolution witnessed an extraordinarydevelopment of the salon culture in Moscow and St Petersburg. At various epochs in their history, London, Edinburghand Parisalso displayedsimilarsocial scenes, but in the number of groups involved and the intensity of their activities they were surpassedby the two Russian capital cities. Particularlystrikingwas the heterogeneity of the Russian assemblies, which spanned the gamut from academic seminars, focusedround a core of inspirationalprofessors,to what amounted to drinking sodalities. In-between came all manner of organizations, some purely social, others philanthropic, literary, theatrical, artisticor political, the last catering for monarchistsat one extreme and Marxistson the other. To most of these groups the events of I9I7 brought a sudden end: the few which managed to adapt to the changed conditions survivedonly into the early I930s. On its title-page, Manfred Shruba's work is termed a 'dictionary', a descriptionwhich can be justified on the formal ground that it consistsof the names of the individualgroups listed alphabetically.But it is more than that. Depending on the information available, each entry gives the dates during which each group existed, its founder/host and his or her successors, the locations of its meetings, the days and times at which it met, its membership and the nature of its functions. Some were no more than unregulated conversaziones, but others adhered to a programme of papers and discussions. Practicallyall includedrefreshments,which were so generousand reliablethat an impecuniousyoung writercould count on a free meal each day of the week by going from one jour-fixe to another. The entries incorporateextractsfrom memoirs and diaries which describe the proceedings of the groups and those who participated in them. Almost every entry is concluded by a full bibliography. The dictionary prints the details about rather more than 350 groups in Moscow and St Petersburg. Since 2004 information about a further thirty groups has come to light. The author has published this supplement in the journal JNovoe literaturnoe obozrenie(77, Moscow, 2006, pp. 493-509). The dictionary itself (pp. i5-274) forms the bulk of the work. Then comes an extensive appendixwhich prints,first,two collectionsof reminiscences,one REVIEWS I45 by A. E. Kaufman and the other by N. V. Drizen (pp. 277-88) and, second, the manifestos of the major literary movements (pp. 288-374). An index (pp. 375-433) gives the names of the figuresmentioned in the dictionary,their dates of birth and death and a brief specificationof their interests.Finally, a systematic index (pp. 434-38) arrangesthe groups according to their literary schools, the particular spheres of their intellectual activity, their political outlook, their sociological character,and the forms which their organizations took, e.g., whether they were private circles, public societies, dining clubs or unions of professionalwriters. A special feature of this work are the illustrationswhich total more than a hundred. Some reproduce the title-pages of literary works composed by members of the groups; others portray individual members; but the most interestingof them all are the groupphotographs.As one looks along the rows of serious,bearded faces, one wonders how many of their possessorsrealized that their world was soon to be swept away. Dr Shruba has brought together a treasure-house of primary sources sufficient to create several works of narrative and analysis. Those who will write them will owe him a profound debt of gratitude. Imperial College London C. L. DRAGE Langen, Timothy. TheStony Dance:Unit andGesture inAndrey Bely's'Petersburg'. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 2005. xiv + I9I pages. Notes. Bibliography.Index. $75.95. How might Belyi's Petersburg be categorized?Tragicomedy, thriller,novel of ideas...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,190
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,910

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetRussian Literature and Bakhtin StudiesTravaux en français237 207