MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379434733 · doi:10.1353/see.2004.0092

Commerce in Russian Urban Culture, 1861-1914 by W. C. Brumfield B. V. Anan'ich Yu. A. Petrov (review)

2004· article· en· W4379434733 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Baron

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipSettlement (finance)HistoryGlossaryIndex (typography)ClassicsSociologyLawPolitical scienceLibrary sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

110 SEER, 82, I, 2004 and its limitations: instructions about provisioning and the (only partially successful) attempts to obtain enough food, reports on the advance party's progress across Siberia (including requests to sack some men who proved unsuitable), attempts to gain information from shipwreckedJapanese sailors and a host of other matters.I cannot emphasize too much how useful all this information is to historians of eighteenth-century Russia, not only to those interested in Siberian exploration and settlement. The series will stand alongside other fine editions, such as A. M. Lysaght's J}oseph Banks in Newfoundland andLabrador, I 766.- His Diagy,Manuscripts andCollections (London, I97I), mentioned because it is on my table at the moment, as monuments not only to scholarship,but to the worldwide spreadof European endeavour and resolution. I sincerely hope that funds will be forthcoming to complete the whole series of volumes. A glossary of archaisms, and thorough name, geographicaland subjectindexes are included. Department ofRussian andSlavonic Studies D. N. COLLINS University ofLeeds Brumfield,W. C., Anan'ich, B. V. and Petrov,Yu.A. (eds).Commerce inRussian UrbanCulture, I86I-I9I4. Woodrow Wilson Center Press and the John Hopkins University Press, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, MD, and London, 2001. XiV+ 239 pp. Illustrations.Notes. Tables. Index. f36.50. THIsbook originated in a Russian-Americanconference held at the Kennan Institute in Moscow in I996. Its stated aim is to examine the emergence in Russia of new commercial elites during the second half of the nineteenth century and their contribution to an emerging urban middle-class culture. The eleven contributorsexplore the social, national and religiousidentitiesof the new businessmen,their social and charitableactivitiesand their influence on the urban environments of significantcommercial centres. The volume's three editors, the distinguished Russian historians of business and banking Boris V. Anan'ich and Yuri A. Petrov, and the American architectural historian William Craft Brumfield, have brought together a number of talented experts, each of whom offersthe reader significantnew insightsinto hitherto neglected topics, and who collectively create a coherent and convincing picture of a new class, with new ways of thinkingand doing, and new architecturalstylesby which theysoughtto projecttheircorporatepower. It is less successful at elucidating the nature of the relationship between individualor group identitiesand the culturalformsthey sponsored. The book opens with an introductorychapterby the editors,which offersa brief overview of the themes of the volume and a brief outline of each paper. Part One of the book includes seven chapters examining differentaspects of imperialRussia's'BusinessCulture'.The firstchapter,by Anan'ichand Sergei G. Beliaev, describesthe development of St Petersburgas the bankingcentre of the empire, and the concomitant emergence of new businessdynasties,such as the houses of Stieglitz and Ginzburg, which had close ties both to the Russian government and to foreign companies and which came to dominate the commerciallandscapeof the capital.By the end of the nineteenth century, REVIEWS I I I St Petersburg'snew classofwealthyfinancierswascomprisedlargelyof former state officials (mainly Finance Ministry civil servants, though retired Prime Ministers,too, such as Vladimir Kokovtsov,were drawninto theirranks)and formermerchants,both from St Petersburgand fromprovincialcities, among whom were a sizeable contingent of national minorities (especiallyJews) and naturalizedforeigners(notablyGermans).Many of the remainingchaptersin the firstpart of the volume develop this picture of a new class. The second chapter by Sergei K. Lebedev, however, considers instead the influence of European businesscultureon St Petersburgbanks.His approach to 'business culture' is disappointinglynarrow, focusing on credit techniques and conditions ,bankruptcyproceduresandthetypesofoperationwhichweretransacted between Russianand foreignbanks.The next chapterby Beliaevis also highly specialized, offeringa narrativeof St Petersburg'suse of bond issues to fund the development of its urban infrastructure.Yuri A. Petrov's all too brief contribution on Moscow banking is of considerablygreater general interest, relatingas it does the storyof the city'sbankingbusinessand the emergence of a stratumof elite financiersto a civic identityin the makingand to the broader political and social context. Among others, he discusses the commercial activitiesand culturalrole of figuressuch asN. A. Naidenov (who publisheda number of definitive works on Moscow's church architecture) and Lazar Poliakov (who built the city's main synagogue), as well as the Riabushinskii, Knopp, WogauandJunker dynasties.He offerssome stimulatingcomparisons between Moscow and Petersburgelites, noting that the formerplayed a more active role in the industrialconcernsin which they invested...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,297
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,973

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsTravaux en français237 207