MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379465834 · doi:10.33137/ic.v1i1.41224

A Canadian in Italy at the End of the Enlightenment: Rossini’s La cambiale di matrimonio

2023· article· en· W4379465834 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gabriele Erasmi

Notice bibliographique

RevueItalian Canadiana · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMusicology and Musical Analysis
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnlightenmentHumanitiesArtTheologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Italians may have been among the first to discover Canada, but it must be said that it took them a very long time to discover Canadians.For several centuries, it would seem, travel agencies provided would-be tourists with only one-way tickets to Canada, and if the French and the English, who were fighting for its possession, could at least benefit from the reports that their governors in North America were routinely filing with their parent governments, the Italians had to rely on old chronicles, occasional reports to the Vatican provided by a few Italian clergymen in Canada (such as Father Bressani)!and, at a later stage, a few popular novels by the likes of Chateaubriand and Fenimore Cooper.? It is not surprising, therefore, that one of the first Canadians to reach, as it were, Italy was a fictional character by the unlikely name of Slook.He showed up in Italy for the first time in 1790 in a comedy by Camillo Federici (the pseudonym of Giovan Battista Viassolo).3The comedy which featured him as the protagonist, La cambiale di matrimonio, must have been popular in its day, for it convinced Slook to start an operatic career.And so in 1807, Federici's five-act comedy was reduced to a farcical one-act libretto by Giuseppe Checcherini, and Slook travelled to Rome to appear in an opera by Carlo Coccia, II matrimonio per lettera di cambio.Unfortunately, it was a flop.4Undaunted and confident in himself, Mr. Slook awaited a better occasion.SO Being a businessman, he knew that in order to succeed one must take risks.So in 1810 he trusted the Marchese Cavalli, when the latter had been stood up by a German composer, and decided to gamble on the talents of an eighteen-year old boy, the son of a trumpet player.The two of them travelled to Venice, where Gaetano Rossi had refashioned the twenty-year old play in a new libretto, and Rossini and Slook met.They obviously liked each other for, a few days later, the score was ready and, on November 3, La cambiale di matrimonio was performed.It was a success.Rossini was paid over 200 Liras and, as a dutiful son, he sent the money to his mother.On the envelope he wrote: Alla Signora Rossini, madre del famoso maestro Gioacchino Rossini, Via Maggiore 240 Bologna?Always a man of great common sense, Slook took his success with equanimity.Completely at ease with Rossinis music, in 1811, he travelled to Trieste and Padua; then, in 1816, to Barcelona; in 1814-15, to Cremona; then back to Trieste, in 1822.In 1834 and 1837, he went to Vienna, where he became known as Der Brautigam von Canada, the bridegroom from Canada.'For some reason, at this stage in his career, he started travelling less often; the new century, however, brought him a new lease on life.He again visited the major Italian theatres and, in 1937, he returned to Vienna; he even went to New York for the first time.Now a respectable international figure, he made it to Brussels in 1957.As it often happens, however, no one is a prophet in his own country.If it were not for the foresight of a group of students in British Columbia, who staged La cambiale in 1959 in Vancouver, and provided him with a welcome return ticket to his country, he never would have made it back.8His prospects are not bad.It is true that his original creator is not faring all too well these days: Federici's works, in thirteen volumes, were last published in Florence and Milan in 1827.A nine-volume MR

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,108
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,337

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0280,010
Communication savante0,0090,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueItalian CanadianaMême sujetMusicology and Musical AnalysisTravaux en français237 207