Review of: Praveen Jha, Avinash Kumar and Yamini Mishra (eds) (2020) Labouring Women: Issues and Challenges in Contemporary India
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The issue of women's employment and participation in the labour force is widely debated for a multitude of reasons.Neglecting women's unpaid labour and care work, the gender wage gap, undermining and under-reporting women's paid work in statistics are a few of the significant ones in the body of scholarship.The book Labouring Women: Issues and Challenges in Contemporary India, edited by Praveen Jha, Avinash Kumar and Yamini Mishra, makes a significant contribution to the domain of research on women's employment and labour force participation.For academic scholars in sociology, development studies, gender and economics, as well as decision-makers, this book is noteworthy.The book has an introduction by the editors and twelve chapters written by seventeen different authors.The entire collection is well-written, interesting and covers a variety of labourrelated issues.By concentrating on conceptual and methodological issues of women's labour, it seeks to address some of the key issues surrounding women's work.The contrasts between paid and unpaid labour, as well as between economic and non-economic activities in the labour market, are also highlighted and discussed.As has already been said, it is crucial to take the differences into account because a significant portion of women's unpaid labour is disregarded and invisible in statistics reports.Each chapter in the book offers a comprehensive examination of a particular case study using both pertinent theory and a quantitative approach.The volume's introduction makes the case that the various elements of the intersection between the labour question and the women's question are of primary interest.All the chapters have a focus on comprehending the interconnection between paid and unpaid work, present alternative theories, and draw attention to methodological concerns related to women's labour market participation.From Jayati Ghosh's term "time poverty", which refers to women having little time for themselves, through discussions of care work, underpaid work, women domestic workers, land rights, common property resources and the role of public investment in boosting women's livelihoods, a wide variety of viewpoints are well combined in the book.Feminist scholarship, history, politics and sociology are all included since the economics discipline's interest in women and labour also makes these fields relevant.This comprehensive book offers some remarkable insights.For instance, the World Economic Forum's (WEF) 2017 Global Gender Gap Report reveals that India has under-performed in areas like economic engagement, educational achievement and health status.The study's findings also indicate that women's participation rates in the labour force have decreased nationwide during the past forty years, which raises methodological issues with the data collected.In contrast to this
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».