MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379617290 · doi:10.1353/iur.2016.a838380

Union labelling information for everyone who wants it

2016· article· en· W4379617290 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Union Rights · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCorporate Governance and Law
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProduct (mathematics)ClothingBusinessAppealGrievancePackaging and labelingAdvertisingPolitical scienceMarketingLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Union product labelling has taken a couple of dramatic steps into the digital age in Canada. There is a long tradition across North America of helping progressive shoppers identify union-made goods and services when they shop. As early as the 1880s many unions commonly marked their goods – labels in clothing, signs in shop windows, union ‘bugs’ on printed goods, stamps and other marks on product labels. Famously in the 1920s and 1930s the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, which dominated the needle trades across North America in that time, developed the ‘Look for the Union Label’ campaign including a song to drive home the message. The appeal for buying union in those early days was to provide some assurance to consumers that the goods they were buying were not produced in sweat shops. The workers who made your dress or shoes or canned goods were paid fairly, with reasonable benefits and a grievance procedure and other protections against high-handed employers or supervisors. This motivation still exists today, though most clothing is now made in Asian sweatshops offshore. Nonetheless, Canadian and US unions have traditionally printed lists of union-made goods in their city or region for distribution mainly to union members. In many regions special Union Label Trades Councils were formed for this purpose. The AFL-CIO and the Canadian Labour Congress both supported these initiatives, and the US organisation still publishes a union-made list though it is not comprehensive. In Canada there was no serious attempt to create a national list mainly because of the significant logistical challenges involved. Compounding the problem is the virtual disappearance of union labels in clothing, cards in shop windows and union bugs on consumer products today. The entreaty to ‘Look for the Union Label’ is futile. All which explains why, on January 1, 2012 we launched ShopUnion.ca. The website solves the distribution problem because our database is available to anyone anywhere with a computer, tablet or cell phone. It also solves the ‘union label’ problem because it uses product and manufacturer names rather than a tag, logo, sign or label to identify union-made goods. And we have made a point of collecting other regional or local lists whenever we can and dumping that information into our data base. Additionally, the data in the web site can be updated and changed on the fly, a major advantage over print. The web site uses the same search metaphor as Google. Items are identified with a list of key words, and users are encouraged to use the simplest, most common name for what they want. The site gives you the name and location of the business, its web site and the union. We post listings of products made anywhere in North America which are generally available for sale in stores across Canada and the United States. We do not pretend we have every union product made, but we are set up to accommodate as many as there are, and we are relentless in our search. We rely heavily on unions to share with us the names of companies they have under collective agreement. We have also sought out information on condiments, canned goods, breakfast cereals, snacks, candy, beer, wine, drugs and other such products which are quite often manufactured by large unionised companies. We then write a set of key words which represent the items or services they produce, and mount it in our data base. Listing services requires us to offer a region-specific search. It is not useful, for instance, to get a list of taxi cab companies in Toronto if you need a cab in Vancouver. Aside from listings, the two major challenges in managing ShopUnion.ca is attracting visitors to the site and playing the bills. We have found that social media and the communications apparatus of unions are our most productive means of informing progressive shoppers of the existence of the site. It is a free service to them, so that reduces the barriers to contact considerably. And our surveys have demonstrated to us that there is indeed a pentup demand for information on unionised goods. When people know where to go, they sign on. We...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,718
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,835

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,004
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle