MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379617628 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2006.0079

Literary Culture and Female Authorship in Canada 1760-2000 by Faye Hammill Carol Shields, Narrative Hunger, and the Possibilities of Fiction by Edward Eden , Dee Goertz (review)

2006· article· en· W4379617628 sur OpenAlex
Susan Billingham

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShort Stories in Global Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeCriticismArgument (complex analysis)Literary criticismArt historySociologyHistoryLiteratureArtMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

240 Reviews Literary Culture and Female Authorship in Canada 1760-2000. By Faye Hammill. (Cross/Cultures, 63) Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. 2003. xxiv + 245 pp. ?54; $64 (pbk?28; $33). ISBN 90-420-0915-2 (pbk 90-420-0905-5). Carol Shields, Narrative Hunger, and thePossibilities ofFiction. Ed. by Edward Eden and Dee Goertz. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: University of Toronto Press. 2003. x + 323 pp. $60; ?40 (pbk $27-95;?i8). ISBN 0-8020-3660-0 (pbk 0-8020-8489-3). In Literary Culture and Female Authorship in Canada IJ60-2000 Faye Hammill reconsiders six canonical women writers: Frances Brooke, Susanna Moodie, Sara Jeannette Duncan, Lucy Maud Montgomery, Carol Shields, and Margaret Atwood. While 1760-2000 may seem a broad spectrum of time, the writers and works have been selected to reveal the conditions of their respective socio-literary contexts, and the increasingly self-conscious development of a Canadian canon. Like all HammiU's criticism, the argument is lucid, well structured, and carefully researched, provid? ing an overview of the prevailing critical trends on these authors. HammiU's close readings pay attention to the specific situation of each writer, while also illuminat? ing commonalities and continuities between them. Arranged chronologically by date of birth, each chapter focuses on the individual, but concludes with reflections that position the writer in relation to the other subjects of the study. This makes for a coherent cumulative argument. (The only exception to this pattern occurs in the final chapter, where Hammill compares Atwood's and Shields's projections of the iconic Susanna Moodie in their works.) At the same time, each section could be read as a free-standing essay, thanks to explanatory footnotes and cross-references. This will facilitate accessibility for readers interested in only one of the figures examined. This study succeeds within the limits of its chosen focus, and will prove a valu? able contribution for students and teachers engaging with Canada's most established women writers. Contemporary students will no doubt find the last third of the text most interesting, for its analysis and comparison of the prominent trio of Shields, Atwood, and the foremother/textual construct Moodie. But Hammill is equally to be commended for her consideration of the often neglected or marginalized figures of Brooke, Duncan, and Montgomery. Her chapters on the latter two in particular re? flectupon the workings of Canadian canon formation and the academy. Montgomery represents those writers of popular or children's literature automatically denigrated and excluded from consideration as serious literature or objects of intellectual study. Duncan, a writer who rarely chose 'Canadian' settings or content and who focused on social and political commentary, was inevitably excluded by the dominant nationa? list discourse emerging in the 1960s and 1970s. The strategic pairings of six women writers make visible the shifting preoccupations of Canadian literary criticism. The book's main strength, its tightness of focus, may also be viewed as a weakness by some readers. All the writers are white, middle-class, heterosexual. In one brief passage in the introduction Hammill does evince a momentary awareness of race and class, alongside region and gender, as 'missing' factors in Canada's racist and exclusionary construction of cultural nationalism (pp. xviii-xix). It would be unfair to criticize a book for failure to include material clearly not intended as part of its remit. But the close focus on these authors makes it easy to forgetthat they represent only the most canonical and well-established heritage of Canadian female authorship. A more self-conscious foregrounding of their privilege and the changing shape of recent Canadian publishing might have served to remind readers of this fact. HammiU's work also appears twice in Edward Eden and Dee Goertz's collection on Carol Shields, Narrative Hunger, and thePossibilities ofFiction. The volume is divided into four sections. The firstis a lecture by Shields, 'Narrative Hunger and the Overflowing Cupboard', given in 1996 at Hanover College. Shields's address becomes a MLR, ioi.i, 2006 241 touchstone for her critics in the discussions that follow. The lecture sums up many key facets of Shields's career: her focus on the quotidian; her awareness of the multitude of lost...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,699
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,810

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle