MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379619744 · doi:10.1353/his.2023.a899613

Feeling Feminism: Activism, Affect, and Canada’s Second Wave by Lara Campbell, Dawson Michael and Catherine Gidney (review)

2023· article· en· W4379619744 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Emotions Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeelingFeminismPoliticsSociologyAffect (linguistics)Gender studiesPsychoanalysisTheme (computing)ShameAestheticsPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceArtLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Feeling Feminism: Activism, Affect, and Canada’s Second Wave by Lara Campbell, Dawson Michael and Catherine Gidney Nancy Janovicek Campbell, Lara, Michael Dawson, and Catherine Gidney, eds.–Feeling Feminism: Activism, Affect, and Canada’s Second Wave. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2022. 324 p. Feeling Feminism is a fascinating collection of essays about second-wave feminist activism in Canada because it centres the very thing that has been used to justify women’s exclusion from politics for centuries: emotion. Drawing on feminist political theory that rejects the dichotomy of emotional feminine reaction and rational masculine reason, the editors explain that the essays are not about ‘emotional’ women but, rather how women “used emotion for control” (p. 18). Informed by affect theory and the history of emotion, the essays examine diverse organizations and actions to demonstrate how women mobilized their emotions to challenge gendered inequalities. Following critical race theorists (in particular bell hooks, Audre Lorde, Patrician Hill Collins, and Gloria Anduzula), the essays demonstrate that emotions can be productive because they create activist communities based on shared experiences. But emotional bonds among activists can also be exclusionary; to be a useful lens for analysis, historians must be aware of how emotions are shaped by hierarchies of power. The essays are attentive to how bonds of connectedness forged in passionate activism often shame those who do not meet—or may reject—activists’ ideals and imaginations of equality. [End Page 200] A central theme of the book is that emotions are both individual and public. Contributions by Whitney Wood and Cheryl Krasnick Warsh use letters to examine women’s emotional responses to maternal health and potential threats to their children’s health. Drawing from her research on pain in childbirth, Wood examines letters mothers wrote to Grantly Dick-Read, who promoted “natural childbirth” to counter the medicalization of childbirth in the postwar era. Women expressed pride that they had endured the pain of childbirth, shame if they did not, and anger if they believed that unwanted medical intervention had robbed them of the experience. Krasnick Warsh uses mothers’ “fan mail” to Frances Oldham Kelsey thanking her for preventing thalidomide from being approved in the United States. She argues letters to well-known people is a unique epistolary form because the intent is to direct action. Individual letters produced collective anger about male control over childbirth and the threat to children’s health fuelled the women’s health movement. Activism entails a range of emotions, often simultaneously, because of the various gendered and racialized life experiences of organizers. Essays by Kevin Brushett and Josette Brun et al. examine women working in male-dominated spaces. Using the Company of Young Canadians (CYC) to reassess the origins of the second wave in the New Left, Brushett argues that the burnout and isolation that CYC women experienced informed their feminist practice of understanding the connections between the personal and the political. Disempowerment in a male-dominated environment helped them envision a different way of doing politics based in developing a nurturing community. Using the 1981 Women’s Journalists’ Conference in Quebec, Josette Brun, Laurie Leplanche, and Sophie Doucet examine the emotional tension in the discussions about succeeding in a male-dominated profession based on competitiveness while trying to adapt the profession to accommodate women’s familial responsibilities. While proud of their accomplishments, women at the conference also talked about the shame, guilt, and embarrassment caused by time away from children. Alienation and isolation were common experiences in women-only groups, too. Funké Aladejebi examines black teachers’ anger and frustration in the Federation of Women Teachers’ Association of Ontario. Her analysis of white women’s inability to hear black women’s discussions of racism within the profession demonstrates how hierarchies of emotions could exist within a group and also for the need to centre race in affect theory. Sarah Nickel draws on Dian Million’s theorization of “felt knowledge” to examine a range of emotional responses in British Columbia Indigenous women’s activism and argues that “political work is emotional in nature, just as emotions are, in fact, labour” (p. 74). Activists mobilized mourning, exhaustion, and loss to make critical interventions into the colonial legal...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,631
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle