MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379621474 · doi:10.1353/iur.2019.a838220

Editorial: towards universal ratification for freedom of association rights?

2019· editorial· en· W4379621474 sur OpenAlex
Daniel Blackburn

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Union Rights · 2019
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLabor Movements and Unions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRatificationFreedom of associationPolitical scienceFundamental rightsCollective bargainingLaw and economicsConventionHuman rightsInternational human rights lawLawObligationTrade unionDeclarationSociologyInternational tradeBusinessPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

2 | International Union Rights | 26/3 EDITORIAL Editorial: towards universal ratification for freedom of association rights? Continuing the thematic focus of IUR 26(2) on the ILO in its Centenary year, this edition looks in particular at the state of what ICTUR regards as the ILO’s most fundamental instruments, the Conventions on Freedom of Association (No. 87) and Collective Bargaining (No. 98). These particular instruments are so crucial from a trade union rights perspective because they provide the fundamental protection in international law for trade unions to exist, to function, and to carry out their activities. To give a very basic sense of these instruments, Convention No. 87 is concerned with the existence of unions, their founding, and free functioning. It protects their right to take action, and the civil liberties of trade unionists. Convention No. 98 outlines an obligation to promote collective bargaining, and it requires that trade unionists have protection against acts of interference. The two instruments together provide the foundations for trade unions to operate. As such they are critical, even within the framework of the ILO’s ‘fundamental’ or ‘core’ labour standards. Conventions Nos. 87 and 98 are understood as ‘enabling’ rights (see ILO 2019 Declaration, Chapter II, A (vi)). The idea behind this is that where collective organisation and action are protected this provides an effective basis from which workers can agitate for, and hopefully win, respect for other rights. Most countries have ratified both of them. What is problematic is that a core group of countries are still holding out against ratification of either instrument. And it is extraordinary that prominent among these are a very significant section of the founder members of the ILO: China, Brazil, India, Iran, and New Zealand. The US was not a founding member, but it has also not ratified either convention. Of the ILO founders group, Nick Henry recalls that New Zealanders played a key role in drafting Convention No. 87, but the government of 1948 ‘chose to ignore the advice of their own delegation’. Varied strands of authoritarianism have been similarly hesitant to embace freedom of association, but some are changing. Anita Chan reports on the disparity between the situation in Vietnam, which has just ratified Convention No. 98 (and is tabled to ratify Convention No. 87 ‘by 2023’) and in China, the two countries, Chan tells us, are ‘on different trajectories’: ‘Vietnam is opening up politically while China is becoming increasingly suppressive’. Growing political authoritarianism is also the subject of our report from Brazil, where Ericson Crivelli describes further threats to trade union rights. While Jamshid Ahmadi told a recent ICTUR meeting that ratification remains just ‘a dream’ for Iranian workers,. Ratification by India is still discussed in committees, reports Sindhu Menon, but the unions have little faith in that process, which one union leader describes as ‘eye-wash’ and ‘farce’. But there are also success stories. Canada, Mexico, and Vietnam all recently ratified Convention No. 98, and we await news from South Korea, where Mikyung Ryu reports on the problems that have stalled ratification, but which is still expected, and may be imminent. And David Bacon outlines an optimistic assessement of the potential for labour reform under new laws passed in Mexico, following that country’s ratification of Convention 98 in 2018. The new government, is ‘undoing 36 years of neoliberal economic reforms’. Finally, Sudan remains one of the few key countries in Africa not to have ratified Convention No. 87. We hear from three Sudanese colleagues and gain their insight into the unfolding revolution. Daniel Blackburn, Editor Next issue of IUR Articles between 850 and 1800 words should be sent by email (mail@ictur.org) and accompanied by a photograph and short biographical note of the author. Please send by 15 November 2019 if they are to be considered for publication in the next issue of IUR. Subscribe to IUR / Affiliate to ICTUR Subscriptions: Print only £25 (individual rate), Print and electronic £75 (individual or institutional), Electronic only £55 (individual or institutional). Affiliations: (includes print and electronic access, and more, see www.ictur.org) Individual £50, Branch / local union £75 (includes 3 subscriptions), National (contact ICTUR for details). Name/Organisation Address Email Payment...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,243
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,982

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle