MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379621567 · doi:10.1353/grp.2017.0013

Group Workbook for Treatment of Persistent Depression: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) Therapist's Guide by Lilane Sayegh and J. Kim Penberthy , and: Group Workbook for Treatment of Persistent Depression: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) Patient's Guide by Lilane Sayegh and J. Kim Penberthy (review)

2017· article· en· W4379621567 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Danielle La Rocco

Notice bibliographique

RevueGroup · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMental Health Research Topics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWorkbookDepression (economics)PsychotherapistPsychologyPsychological interventionMental healthPsychiatryGroup psychotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

issn 0362-4021 © 2017 Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society group, Vol. 41, No. 3, Fall 2017 267 1 Correspondence should be addressed to Danielle La Rocco, MD, Department of Psychiatry , NYU School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, 7th floor, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: Danielle.LaRocco@nyumc.org. Book Reviews Group Workbook for Treatment of Persistent Depression: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) Therapist’s Guide. By Lilane Sayegh and J. Kim Penberthy. New York: Routledge, 2016, 134 pp. Group Workbook for Treatment of Persistent Depression: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) Patient’s Guide. By Lilane Sayegh and J. Kim Penberthy. New York: Routledge, 2016, 103 pp. Reviewed by Danielle La Rocco1 Depression is a major public health concern with an immense need for better, quicker, and more accessible treatments. Over the course of a lifetime, 10%–15% of people will meet criteria for the illness, but most people do not have access to care or do not avail themselves of treatment (Lépine & Briley, 2011). Even in developed countries, only one-third to one-half of individuals with severe symptoms receive treatment. In less-developed countries, few people suffering from depression get mental health treatment at all (Lépine & Briley, 2011). A reliable cure for depression resulting in a complete remission of symptoms has eluded us so far; some patients with depression will remain symptomatic despite multiple interventions with antidepressants and psychotherapy. These lasting symptoms stress not only the individual sufferer but also the social, familial, and economic systems containing that person. The World Health Organization projects that by 2030, depression will be the leading contributor to chronic disability and loss of productive time (Lépine & Briley, 2011). Furthermore, people with persistent depression have a shorter life expectancy because of the risks for suicide, heart 268 la rocco disease, and stroke (Lépine & Briley, 2011). There is a distinct gender difference as well: Worldwide, twice as many women as men are afflicted with depression, especially during their reproductive years, raising questions about how depression may affect populations as a whole. These forecasts are a call to action to the mental health community. What effective and affordable treatments do we have to offer? For group psychotherapists, the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) for the treatment of persistent depression offers a specific and well-researched treatment modality. In the preface to both books, the authors indicate that they are well aware of the epidemiological data cited previously. Compelled to rise to the challenge, Liliane Sayegh, a clinical psychologist at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute of Montreal, and J. Kim Penberthy, a clinical psychologist and professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral science at the University of Virginia, have coauthored two volumes on group CBASP: one for therapists and one for patients. Both authors acknowledge their indebtedness to James P. McCullough Jr., a professor of psychology and psychiatry at Virginia Commonwealth University. He and his collaborators created CBASP, which the authors state is the only evidence-based psychotherapy model designed specifically for patients suffering from persistent depressive disorder (PDD), as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The approach focuses on the particular interpersonal difficulties faced by patients with depression, who often underestimate or ignore their own contributions to undesired social outcomes. The treater’s manual for group CBASP outlines the authors’ theoretical viewpoint: In their assessment, people with PDD function psychologically at a preoperational level. According to Piaget’s model, they do not conceptualize interpersonal situations from multiple viewpoints. In other words, these patients do not “mentalize.” As a result, they fail to appreciate how their actions (a tendency to withdraw, to act with submissiveness or hostility) directly contribute to the negative social outcomes they most dread. This approach, through overt didactic teaching, as well as through the words and actions of the group leader and group members, teaches patients how they do indeed have “stimulus value” within their lives. Ideally, patients become more able to assert their needs over time and are able to attain achievable interpersonal goals. The actual content of the treatment, briefly summarized, is as follows. First, the patient meets individually with a CBASP therapist for...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,064
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,215

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0640,058

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,342 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGroup→Même sujetMental Health Research Topics→Travaux en français237 207→