MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379622300 · doi:10.1353/iur.2017.a838314

Editorial: BRICS is challenging the global economic model, and unions see some potential in this

2017· editorial· en· W4379622300 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Blackburn

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Union Rights · 2017
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLabor Movements and Unions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSolidarityChinaDominance (genetics)Freedom of associationPolitical sciencePolitical economyTrade unionInternational tradeEconomicsHuman rightsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

2 | International Union Rights | 24/4 EDITORIAL Editorial: BRICS is challenging the global economic model, and unions see some potential in this This edition of IUR looks at how the global BRICS group of countries was formed, looks at their priorities and activities, and asks how trade unions are engaging with the BRICS to promote reform. Bethuel Maserumule questions how trade unions in emerging economies should orientate themselves with respect to the dominance of States that in some cases have failed to ratify freedom of association. Chinese investment, he observes, ‘has been flooding South Africa with cheap manufacturing and agricultural products, resulting in massive job losses as factories close or scale down operations’, while Chinese MNCs ‘do not respect the workers right to freedom of association’. China labour specialist Katie Quan shares with IUR a recent article discussing efforts by sections of the US labour movement to reach out to and engage with the ACFTU. These efforts, Quan tells us, have ‘a troubled history’, have been ‘decidedly slow’, and left the Americans with a sense that ‘concepts of solidarity might be very different from those of the ACFTU, and that their goals for developing relationships and activities might not be exactly the same’. Quan’s analysis reveals the distance between the ACFTU and many Western unions and throw into relief the cooperation that exists within the BRICS Trade Union Forum, where Indian and Brazilian unions that were formerly part of the ICFTU, and the ITUC President, have sat alongside the ACFTU and trade unions from quite different traditions. Almost uniquely, within the BRICS Trade Union Forum, these unions all work together effectively in support of a progressive challenge to neo-liberalism. Challenging the dominance of the neo-liberal economic model, and of the dominance of American and European interests in international forums, has been one clearly successful outcome of the work of the BRICS group. But as BRICS becomes more established as a global political grouping, can the bloc sustain this challenge as the political character of its member States undergoes change? India joined BRICS under a Congress leadership, but now participates under the BJP. In Brazil the liberal right has gained power under a dubious process based around the impeachment of the left-wing President, rapidly implementing aggressive social spending and labour law reform. Ana Gomes writes that they constitute ‘one of the most regressive steps in Brazil’s contemporary history of labour regulation’. In this edition we are not exclusively concerned with the BRICS countries, and look also at developments in northern Europe. Eric Sjödin explains the latest Swedish labour law changes, which to an extent restore trade union power that was curtailed by the European Court of Justice in the infamous Laval case. Wolfgang Däubler describes how, following a political and legal battle, rights for independent unions received a new level of protection, having previously been largely subsumed under the rights of majority unions. Also in this edition, David Doorey reports on litigation attempted in Canada by victims of the catastrophic 2012 Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh. Sadly the outcome was discouraging, Doorey concluding that ‘the vacuousness of CSR seems not only to be confirmed by this decision, but to be promoted as a virtue worthy of legal protections’… Daniel Blackburn, Editor Next issue of IUR Articles between 850 and 1800 words should be sent by email (mail@ictur.org) and accompanied by a photograph and short biographical note of the author. Please send by 5 March 2018 if they are to be considered for publication in the next issue of IUR. Subscribe to IUR / Affiliate to ICTUR Subscriptions: Print only £25 (individual rate), Print and electronic £75 (individual or institutional), Electronic only £55 (individual or institutional). Affiliations: (includes print and electronic access, and more, see www.ictur.org) Individual £50, Branch / local union £75 (includes 3 subscriptions), National (contact ICTUR for details). Name/Organisation Address Email Payment on invoice / Payment enclosed For discounted rates please contact IUR’s Editor Daniel Blackburn on ictur@ictur.org. All subscription services are available via our website: www.ictur.org/affiliation.htm ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,123

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,039
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,005
Communication savante0,0140,007
Science ouverte0,0040,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0280,025
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,027

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Union RightsMême sujetLabor Movements and UnionsTravaux en français237 207