MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379622498 · doi:10.1353/iur.2009.0059

Reflections from the past

2009· article· en· W4379622498 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Tucker

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Union Rights · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic Theory and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParallelsState (computer science)Political scienceHostilityDemocracyFinancial crisisPolitical economyEconomic historyDevelopment economicsLawEconomicsPoliticsPsychologyOperations managementKeynesian economics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FOCUS□ LABOURRIGHTSANDTHE GLOBALECONOMY Reflections from the past As ens markets the and current increases state global intervention on economic a massive into crisis scale, financial deepitis ens and stateintervention into financial markets increases on a massivescale,itis only naturalforlabour rightsactivists to ask whether theremay also be an opportunity to reverse thetrendof labourmarket deregulation thathas prevailed in muchof theindustrialised worldforthepastthirty yearsand to strengthen labourrights. It is also notsurprising thatmany NorthAmericanliberalsand progressives are comparingthe current situationto the Great Depressionand askingwhether a modernNew Deal forworking people might be in theoffing. Canhistory repeatitself andifso howandunder whatcircumstances? Therecertainly are enoughhistorical parallels betweenthepresent crisis andthe1920stojustifythecomparison . Intheaftermath ofWorld War I therewas enormoussocial unrestas workers who had fought a war abroadforfreedom and democracy wantedtogetsomeforthemselves at home.In mostcountries, however, thepost-war workers' revolt was crushed leadingtoa restorationoftheold regime inwhichworkers enjoyed few individual labourrights and unionsfaced state-backed employer hostility to theirorganisingefforts . Underthisregime, incomeinequality skyrocketed as elitessuccessfully appropriated forthemselves larger sharesofsocially produced wealth.The labourmovement retreated from its efforts toorganise semi-skilled industrial workers inmassproduction industries and instead fought defensive battles onbehalf oftheskilled menthat formed itscoreconstituency. The neo-liberal turnin thelate1970scame in the aftermath of the anti-warmovement, an upsurge ofsocialmovements demanding greater equality forgroupsleft outofthepreviousNew Deal, and a periodoflabourmilitancy thatproducedhighlevelsofstrike activity andsuccessful demandsforimproved healthand safety laws as wellas individual labourrights prohibiting workplace discrimination and providing forunpaid leaves.Although thesemovements havenotbeen crushed, muchofthewindhasgoneoutoftheir sails.Thelabourmovement inparticular has sufferedenormous losses,especiallyin theprivate sector, and a smalleconomicelitehas sharply increased itsincomewhileworking people have seentheir wagesstagnate ordecline. Thus both the current crisisand the Great Depressionariseagainst thebackground ofsuccessfulprojectsto restoreunsocialisedmarket regimes. Whilethecrisis ofsucha regime creates opportunitiesto resocialise capitalism and advance labour rights, thereare certainly no guarantees that thiswillbe theoutcome.Indeed, history points toother pathsthat might be taken. One isthat thecrisis willbe resolved without any significant changeand the unsocialisedmarket regimewillcontinuewithin thepoliticalframeworkofliberal democracy. A secondistheriseof authoritarian capitalist states, exemplified byfascisminthe1920sand30s .Finally, a third issocial revolution, leadingto a fundamental changein property and classrelations. Although fascism or socialismare possibleoutcomesof the current crisis,our focushere is on the moreprobable alternative of reform or retrenchment. Withthat in mind,we ask whatconditions producedthe new deal alternative in NorthAmericain the 1930sandwhatthat experience might havetotell us abouttheprospects fora new deal forworkersinthefirst decade ofthetwenty-first century. One factorthat numeroushistorianshave emphasised is thattheNew Deal ingeneraland labourrights inparticular didnotcomeaboutprimarily as a top-downresponseof to theGreat Depression. Rather, inboththeUnited States and Canada millionsof workers,employed and unemployed, organised outsidetheframework of existing parties andestablished labourunions, to demand governmentaction. In Canada, for example,unemployed workersformed associationsto demand real jobs and unemployment insurance. Theyoccupiedbuildings in citiesand organised a marchon Ottawa,thenation'scapital , which was brokenup withdeadly force. Across North America, employed workers mobilisedin theirworkplacesand organised unionswithout waitingforunionsto organise them. Awaveofindustrial strike activity putpressureon thegovernment to act.Political leaders recognisedthatprovidingreliefto employers alonewas notgoingtobe enough.Thedemands ofworkers forcollective bargaining rights, minimumstandards and social security, amongothers ,also had to be partially metto resolvethe social and politicalcrisistriggered by the economicone . Of course,the politicalresponseto worker mobilisation was not solelydetermined by the breadthand intensity of the movementfrom below.Rather thana newdeal,there might have been reaction and repression. Thus,thepolitical and ideologicalorientation ofthegovernment in powerwas also crucialto theoutcomeofworker mobilisations. This factor, forexample,may helpexplainthedifference inthetiming and the shape oftheAmerican and Canadiannew deals. TheRoosevelt administration movedmorequicklyand strongly to implement Keynesian policies, ofwhichlabourrights werea component, than the Conservative Bennettand thenthe Liberal Kinggovernments inCanada. Getting labour rights enacted,however,was onlyhalfthebattle. Action from belowwas also necessary to makethoserights effective. In the As the global financialcrisis has deepened inevitable comparisons have been drawnwith the Great Depression ofthe 1920s and 30s ERIC TUCKER isProfessor of Law at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada Pages Volume 16Issuel 2009 INTERNATIONAL union rights FOCUS □ LABOURRIGHTSANDTHE GLOBALECONOMY I potential insights the Tucker Canadian on offer whether current historian comparisons labour any considers as effect labour useful to rights these crisis Eric the of historianEric Tuckerconsiders whetherthese comparisons offer any useful insightsas to the potentialeffectof the currentcrisis on labourrights United States, forexample,autoworkers andothersoccupiedfactories after theenactment ofthe collectivebargaining legislation to gain union recognition and bringtheiremployersto the table.In Canada,wherestatutory collective bargainingwas onlyintroduced in responseto a strike wave during World WarII, a massivepostwar strike wave was necessary to getthatnew regime firmly institutionalised. Insum,thecreation ofa newdealfor labourin the1930'sand 40's might bestbe considered as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,045
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,149

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,020
Communication savante0,0140,015
Science ouverte0,0020,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,019
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0450,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Union RightsMême sujetEconomic Theory and PolicyTravaux en français237 207