Notice bibliographique
Résumé
REPORIG LABOURRIGHTSINCANADA The Canadian Foundation for Labour Rights The new Foundationis intendedto promotelabour rightsinCanada and to encourage ratification ofkey ILOConventions DEREK FUDGE isNational Director of Policy Development for NUPGE in Ottawa For more information on NUPGE's Labour Rights are Human Rights campaign go to www.labowrfghts.ca and if you would like to subscribe to NUPGE's Labour Rights are Human Rights monthly ebulletin , e-mail national@nupge.ca The CCFLR') devoted Canadian was to promoting created Foundation to labour be for a national Labour rights Rights as voice an CCFLR')was createdto be a national voice devotedto promoting labourrights as an important means to strengthening democracy, equality and economicprosperity in Canadaand internationally. Thekeyobjectives theFoundation hasestablished foritself areto: ■ creategreater publicawarenessand understanding oflabourrights as a keycritical component ofhumanrights; ■ buildeffective political momentum and public support forprogressive labourlaw reform; ■ promote fundamental labourstandards in Canadathatenhanceunionorganising; ■ providea critical voiceagainst anyfuture regressive labourlaw beingcontemplated or introduced bya government inCanada; ■ offer coordination on legalchallenges to labourlawswitha viewto strategically movinglabourrights ahead inCanada; ■ promote Canada'scommitments to internationallabourand humanrights standards of theInternational LabourOrganisation (ILO) and monitor thelevelofcompliance tothe standards bythefederal aflďpmvihciárgovernments ; and ■ encourage theGovernment ofCanadato ratifykeyConventions oftheILO. The Foundation is runby a Boardof Directors madeup ofwell-respected humanrights activists, progressivelabour relations academics and union-side labourlawyers.Current members of theBoardincludelabourlawscholar Judy Fudge fromthe University of VictoriaLaw School, British Columbia; well-known labourlawyer Paul Cavalluzzo, whohasledthefight for therights of migrant workersall the way to the Supreme Courtof Canada; Nathaliedes Rossiers, General Counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association;and Drew Plaxton,Chair of the CanadianAssociation ofLabourLawyers. NUPGENational President JamesClancynotes that hisunionwouldliketheFoundation tobe a forum forthebroaderlabourrights community. "Wehope CFLRwillprovide an independent and supportivevoice for progressivelabour law reform and willpromote itsworktothebroader labourrights communities - unionsand other labourorganisations, labourrelations programs within Canadianuniversities andcolleges,labour lawschoolsandlegalfirms andother progressive think tanks". Clancyadded,"we arefortunate to havesomeofthemostprogressive and brightest mindson labourrights in Canada serveon the BoardofDirectors oftheFoundation". CFLR held its inauguralmeetingin May in Toronto.Besidesproviding BoardMembers the opportunity to discusscurrent and pendingconstitutional labourlawcasesinCanadawhichthey are involvedwith,themeeting focusedon two priority agendaitems. CFLRBoard memberPaul Cavalluzzo,Senior Partner with the Toronto-based law firm Cavalluzzo,Hayes,Shilton, Mclntyre & Cornish LLP, provided an overview ofthearguments presentedattheSupreme Court ofCanadaCSC COin the Fraserv. Ontanocase. This case has been ongoing in Canada for over a decade and involvesthedenialof theright to join a union andbargain collectively toagricultural workers in theprovince ofOntario. The case was heardin Canada'sSupremeCourtin December2009and a decisionis pending.Cavalluzzohas been the lead unioncounselforthecase. The outcomeof thiscase is being watched closelyby theCanadianlabourmovement with theexpectation that itwillbuilduponthehistoric June 2007 Supreme Court'sdecision (Health Services and Support - FacilitiesSubsector Bargaining Assn. v. BritishColumbia) where Canada'stopjusticesruledthattheright to collectivebargaining is a constitutional right of all Canadians. Thesecondkeyitem on theagendawas a presentation by UK labour lawyer Marcus Pilgerstorfer, a barrister at Old SquareChambers in London.Pilgerstorfer spoke on theextent to which the European Courtof Human Rights CEctHR')has recognised theright to strike as a component partofArticle 11 (theright to freedomofassociation ) oftheEuropeanConvention on HumanRights and Fundamental Freedoms. He focusedon theDemirand Baykarav.Turkey case as wellas other recent Europeancase law. The Strasbourg Court's jurisprudence has often been comparedwiththepositiontakenby the Supreme Court ofCanadaintheBritish Columbia health workers case. CFLR'sprimeinterest in hearingabout these cases was consideration ofwhatappearstobe a convergence in Canada and Europe courtson interpreting FreedomofAssociation through the applicationof international law. A majorcommonality betweenthetwocourtsis thefactthat both the SCC and the EctHRdeveloped and applieda restricted interpretation offreedom of association intheir earlier case lawandhavenow reversed jurisprudence witha muchmorewider interpretation offreedom ofassociation, basedin parton theapplication ofinternational standards through theILO. The nextmeeting oftheFoundation willtake place in Octoberof thisyearwherethe CFLR Boardwillbegintoconsider building thecase for theprotection ofmigrant workers' rights around theequality section (section15)oftheCanadian Charter ofHumanRights and Freedoms. INTERNATIONAL union rights Page 28Volume 17Issue 3201 0 ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,352 | 0,131 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».