MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379623159 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2002.a828325

Bolder Flights: Essays on the Canadian Long Poem ed. by Frank M. Tierney, Angela Robbeson, and: Dominant Impressions : Essays on the Canadian Short Story ed. by Gerald Lynch, Angela Arnold Robbeson (review)

2002· article· en· W4379623159 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryPoeticsTownsendLiteraturePsychoanalysisAdmirationArt historyHistoryArtPhilosophyPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

952 Reviews poetics', which is disjointed, accumulative, ironic, and metaphorically daring, as it summons a vision of selfhood in the midst of cultural fragmentation. This precariously integrated vision Trehearne calls 'integritas', adopting James Joyce's term. The search for an authentic unity amid cultural chaos is a familiar Modernist ambition ('Thesefragments I have shored against my ruins',lamentsT. S. Eliot'sFisher King), but I am not sure why Trehearne favours the theologically loaded term 'integritas'. As he presents it, however, its Latinate splendour is beset by modern ambiguities. Poetic/cultural/psychological unity becomes a pressing need only because it is absent, and so it is as much an expression of anxiety as the cure of that anxiety. Although it sounds triumphant, it participates in an aesthetic of loss that may replicate the chaos that it is meant to counter. In lyrical poetry, this produces a paradoxical need to 'integrate without unifying', as expressed in the puzzle of 'impersonality' (another of Eliot's maxims) whereby self-afBrmation must be sought through self-effacement. Trehearne shows in patient detail how the four poets undertake this project, with two of them (Page and Klein) eventually falling silent and two (Layton and Dudek) advancing to a more 'personative' style. Trehearne begins with a grand gesture of rewriting Canadian literary history. He shows that the celebrated dispute between two poetic schools, one led by John Sutherland and his magazine First Statement, the other by Patrick Anderson and his rival journal Preview, is factitious, since the two groups actually had much in common. They were all forties poets. Perhaps this is so, but Trehearne makes more of this mi? nor scrap than it deserves; after all, we are talking about a few articles written in the flimsiest ofjournals read by a handful of friends. I do not dispute Trehearne's point, only his need to spend fortypages proving it. He is fond of clear-cut distinctions that he has trouble maintaining. He limits himself to Montreal, but not really, and to a single decade, but with the proviso that it extends from 1942 to 1954. This limitation then forces him to study Layton's weakest poems, since Layton found his poetic voice only in the mid-fifties, while Dudek's best work, Continuations, was written in the 1980s, yet is examined here. Trehearne sometimes overstates his case in an inflated style that grows pompous ('eloign', 'selvage') or self-congratulatory. Still, the book deserves congratulation. It is extremely impressive in its research (archives, variants, letters, and critical articles) and in the acuteness of its analysis. Trehearne writes with an authority that he earns. University of Calgary Jon Kertzer Bolder Flights: Essays on the Canadian Long Poem. Ed. by Frank M. Tierney and Angela Robbeson. (Reappraisals: Canadian Writers, 21) Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 1998. v+192 pp. $25. Dominant Impressions: Essays on the Canadian Short Story. Ed. by Gerald Lynch and Angela Arnold Robbeson. (Reappraisals: Canadian Writers, 22) Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 1999. vi+i68pp. $22. Reappraisals is a stylishly presented series that stems from a yearly symposium held at the University of Ottawa. The series aims to create a body of criticism on neglected Canadian writers or themes, and the two volumes reviewed here, nos. 21 and 22, focus, respectively, on the Canadian long poem and Canadian short stories, both of which are genres somewhat neglected by the critics in relation to Canadian literature as a whole. Bolder Flightsis a tightcollection ofthirteen essays, chronologicallyarranged by the publication dates of the long poems under consideration. The introduction helpfully summarizes the essays but offers no overarching analysis. The individual contribu- MLR, 97.4, 2002 953 tions, while dealing with disparate topics and adopting different critical positions, none the less form a coherent whole. The first essay, by D. M. R. Bentley, noted expert on the Canadian long poem, offersa helpful survey ofthe genre; it ends with a conservative plea against post-structuralist dismissal of the long poem. Indeed, this topic is revisited frequently in the firsthalf of the collection, becoming most noticeable in the two pieces on E. J. Pratt. These essays, by Gwendolyn Guth and Sandra Djwa, which take Smaro Kamboureli's critical text On the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,087
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle