MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379623345 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2002.a828281

Relating to Queer Theory: Rereading Sexual Self-Definition with Irigaray, Kristeva, Wittig and Cixous by Sarah Cooper (review)

2002· article· en· W4379623345 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Hughes

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCinema History and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerQueer theoryHuman sexualityScholarshipSociologyPsychoanalysisGender studiesPsychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

MLR, 97.4, 2002 991 grew out of a graduate seminar taught forone term at the University of Toronto, is of extremely variable quality. Too many of the chapters have a limited, predictable, and even pedestrian quality to them, verging on the descriptive and over-schematic. This is not helped by some sloppy editing, including inconsistencies in the use of names, and occasionally some rambling and undigested passages. Moreover, for a collection entitled The Cinema ofJean Cocteau, much is lacking, in particular a proper sense of Cocteau as a vital and pioneering film theorist, as well as any engagement with his other less well-known but equally important experimental work such as the 1951 short, La Villa Santo-Sospir. The ultimate value of this volume will paradoxically be to force Cocteau scholars to take greater critical and creative risks. University of Kent at Canterbury James S. Williams Relating to Queer Theory: Rereading Sexual Self-Definition with Irigaray, Kristeva, Wittig and Cixous. By Sarah Cooper. Bern: Lang. 2000. 231pp. In an essay entitled 'Against Proper Objects', in a 1994 number of the journal differences ,Judith Butler, the doyenne of contemporary queer theory,expresses disquiet at the territorializing impulse that has led some queer theorists to distinguish theories of sexuality from theories of gender, and to claim the investigation of sexuality as their own particular province, offlimits to feminist analysts of gender. In short, she mounts a critique of separatist practices of scholarship that are, in essence, practices of exclusion. In Relating to Queer Theory, a text in which Butler's voice is accorded a primary place, Sarah Cooper pursues the counter-separatist stance Butler promotes, producing an intricate study that not only mobilizes relations between (French) feminism and queer theory, relations that are invoked in Against Proper Objects', by mapping these epistemological fields with and against each other, but also dissects a question left unexplored by Butler: that is, the question of who can perform queer readings of texts. This issue is the fulcrum of the first two chapters of Cooper's monograph. Here, she reflects compellingly on the issue of whether, in order to 'do' queer theoretical analysis, the reader must him/herself be queer-, lesbian-, or gayidentified , elaborating a theorization of reader relations to queer theory that the work of Butler and fellow queer theorists such as Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick neglects to furnish . Through a virtuoso engagement not only with queer theoretical discourse but also with discussions of ethical and identificatory dynamics proffered by Derrida, Deleuze, and Guattari, and others, she defends the contention that the act of reading queer theoretical texts is a transformative, constitutive act, engendering readers who, regardless of their sexual self-definition, accede to modes of queer identification. Her treatment of the (trans)formative potential of reading queer theory,and her concomitant vision of differentlyidentified queer readers, will undoubtedly reassure those of us who, in enacting queer theoretical exegesis from a straight-identifiedposition, are regularly assailed by doubts as to the ethics of our 'touristic' critical activities. In the remaining four chapters of her study Cooper herself 'does' queer theory,and reviews its relation to feminism, by reading the feminist work of Irigaray, Kristeva, Wittig, and Cixous in a manner informed not only by her own responses to the queer gestures and/or resistances enacted by the writings of these four French feminists,but likewise by the queer theoretical commentaries those writings have elicited, commentaries with which Cooper dialogues proficiently and productively. The encounters Cooper stages between selected texts by the feminists she takes as her focus and the realm of queer theory produce a series of interpretations that cannot fail to leave her reader dazzled and bewitched, and only too willing to do what Cooper exhorts us to do in her conclusion: that is, make new and previously unauthorized connections between ggz Reviews various, variant theoretical disciplines and discourses. She has written a wonderful book, that will certainly have a significant impact on current critical debate. University of Birmingham Alex Hughes Commencementsdu roman: Conferences du seminaire de Litterature comparee de I'Universite de la Sorbonne Nouvelle. Ed. by Jean Bessiere. Paris: Champion. 2001. 216 pp. The preface to this collection suggests that both historical...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,006
Communication savante0,0050,009
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Modern Language ReviewMême sujetCinema History and CriticismTravaux en français237 207