Editorial: Global Framework Agreements
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
lUR □ EDITORIAL Editorial: Global Framework Agreements FlorAgreements a selection ourfocus of (GFAs): this articles month, their on IUR Global implementation, brings Framework together a selection ofarticles on GlobalFramework Agreements (GFAs): theirimplementation, design, development andpotential. Theseinclude somecase studies, witharticles from representativesoffourdifferent globalunionfederations ICEM ,UNI,BWIand PSI - introducing us to key agreements, howthey werenegotiated andimportant lessonsforthefuture. Alongside theseexperiences , we include several contributions that providea broader analysis ofGFAs, their potential and limitations andhowthey articulate withindustrial relations andquestions ofCSR. We beginwithan article byICEM'sDick Blin that provides anoverview ofGFAs, their evolution and someexamplesofICEM'sworkinthisarea. The author makesa case forGFAstobe seen as a starting pointforan ongoing activerelationship between companies andunions, andnotas anend in themselves. A detailedcase studyoftheGFA betweenUNIGlobalUnion,theGMBandG4Sis providedby Christy Hoffman, DeputyGeneral Secretary ofUNIGlobalUnion. Hoffman charts the evolution ofthecampaign overseveral yearsand across four continents, andhighlights, among other impacts oftheagreement, theimportant outcomes ithadfor organising workers. Jim Baker, CoordinatoroftheCouncilofGlobalUnions ,offers an excellent analysisofGFAsin thecontext ofthe RuggieProcessand CSR(thefocusofan earlier edition ofIUR,17.2).Bakerexplores theimplications ofGFAsinterms ofindustrial relations, nationallawandtheir potential asthey develop toinclude languagespecifying compliance bysubcontracted firms and a preference for'secure'employment over'precarious' contracts, andalsotouches upon theimportant roletheyplayinorganising strategies .ICTURVice-President KeithEwingpicksup onthequestion ofthelegalstatus ofGFAs, taking theUK and US intoconsideration and exploring questions around theenforceability ofagreements inthenational context. Dimitris Stevis andMichael Fichter introduce further interpretations on these questions, focusing onthestrategic roleGFAs could havenotjustinregulating capital, butalsoinshapingglobalunionism andglobalsocialdialogue. An interesting case studyofPSI's relationship and involvement inGFAsispresented byJ.Buxbaum, PSI's PublicAdministration and MNECo-ordinator .The author provides an accountofthechallenges encountered bypublic sector unions inmovingfrom a stance ofresistance against privatisation, to negotiation withprivate enterprises providing what were once public services.Finally,Bob Ramsay offers an accountoftheBWI'sagreement with IKEAandthechallenges facedbytheunions toensurecompliance. Thescope ofthisedition isnotlimited toGFAs alone,however, andwearevery pleasedtoinclude articles on otherimportant recent developments forinternational unionrights. Canadianlabour lawyer VeemaVerma givesherassessment ofthe Ontario v Fraser decisioninCanadaanditsimplications for thecollective bargaining rights ofagricultural workers. DavidBaconwrites aboutrecent proposals for labourlawreform inMexico, with a vividaccountofhowunionsandother organisationsare responding to thechallenges facedby thestate's anti-labour legislation. Finally, weinclude a short piecebythePakistan Workers' Federation thatalertsus to changesto labourlegislation in Pakistan andthethreat tofreedom ofassociation. Finally, IURis grateful fortheeditorial collaboration ofDickBlin, ICEM's HeadofCommunications andCampaigns, whoassisted intheplanning and commissioning ofthisedition.IUR extendsits thanks alsotoallthecontributors for sharing their expertise withourreaders. Acting Editor Elizabeth Molinari INTERNATIONAL union rights Page 2Volume 18Issue 2201 1 Next issue of IUR Articles between 850and1,900words should besentbyemail (mail@ictur.org) andaccompanied bya photograph andshort biographical note oftheauthor. Photographs illustrating thetheme ofarticles arealways welcome. Allitems must bewith usby30August 2011 if they are tobeconsidered for publication inthenext issueofIUR. Subscribe toAW; tosubscribe, complete theboxbelow. I/we would like tosubscribe toInternational Union Rights andenclose£20/US$30/€25. Name/Organisation Address PostCode Four issues£20/US$30/€25. Cheques should bemadepayable to"IUR" andsentto:ICTUR, 177Abbeville Road, London SW49RL, UK ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle