MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379623799 · doi:10.1353/iur.2017.a838329

Focus: The Voice of the People

2017· article· en· W4379623799 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Union Rights · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOpposition (politics)Government (linguistics)PoliticsAlliancePolitical sciencePublic administrationEmpowermentCommissionSociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

10 | International Union Rights | 24/3 FOCUS | FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION With Bermuda facing rising unemployment and an unequal burden of sacrifice being placed on the lowest and the least, a coalition of concerned persons including Bermuda’s unions and community groups formed the People’s Campaign for Equality, Jobs and Justice. The People’s Campaign was represented by three principals: Rev. Nicholas Tweed, Bro. Chris Furbert, President of the Bermuda Industrial Union, and myself, Jason Hayward, President of the Bermuda Public Services Union. As a group, we were concerned with the growing frustration and mistrust of the political process and the organisation provided a voice for the people during a very controversial time in our history. To raise the public’s awareness about key issues facing the island, the People’s Campaign organised a number of successful public rallies, marches and town hall meetings. The focus of these events included topics such as the economic impact of the government’s budget on its people, the need for comprehensive immigration reform, unfair banking practices and the government’s proposed precertification of medical testing for Bermuda’s healthcare system. The People’s Campaign also called for a Commission of Inquiry into the historical losses of citizens’ property through theft and/or dispossession . Additionally, we produced a monthly newsletter which focused on evaluating the effectiveness of the Government and the Opposition and organised a Youth Empowerment Symposium. In November 2014, the then Finance Minister Bob Richards announced that the One Bermuda Alliance (OBA) Government had reached an agreement with the Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC) for the construction and financing of a new airport terminal building. CCC is a Crown corporation of the Government of Canada whose purpose is to assist Canadian businesses access foreign government procurement markets through government-to-government contracting. Given the impact that it would have on the public purse and job creation, the People’s Campaign was keenly interested in the $290m airport redevelopment project. Given our position on the importance of good governance and transparency, we were concerned with the process used to select Aecon as the contractor for the project by circumventing the Island’s tendering process. Additionally, it was felt that this project would potentially create a burden on the Government’s resources that would impede its ability to respond to the needs of vulnerable members of the public. Our concerns were also shared with the majority of the people of Bermuda, a sentiment reflected in a survey which was carried out in 2015 that revealed that 75percent of Bermudians felt it was a bad deal for Bermuda. With the support of the Bermuda Trade Union Congress, the People’s Campaign led the objections against this deal on behalf of the people of Bermuda. It is against this backdrop that I, along with my colleagues, became the primary targets of the former Government attacks. A people’s right: access to information The unwillingness of the Bermuda Government to provide the public with details on the deal brokered with CCC and Aecon led the People’s Campaign to submit an ‘Access to Information Request’ with the Canadian Government seeking access to documentation related to this project. As CCC is a Crown corporation, it is subject to the Access to Information Act which gives the public the right of access to the records of government institutions. Through this request, the People’s Campaign obtained copies of over 2000 emails related to this deal. The information contained in these emails highlighted some stark contradictions between the public statements made by MP Bob Richards versus the private exchanges made by the OBA Government, CCC and Aecon. These contradictions were most notably related to the lack of due diligence in the procurement process, transparency, misinformation and privatisation. The People’s Campaign believed that the public should have access to these emails so that they could discern for themselves whether or not our political leaders were acting in their best interest. A people’s right: freedom of speech Committed to the principles of good governance, accountability and transparency, the People’s Campaign released these documents to the public, and on 11 May 2015 held a special broadcast on a local television talk...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,914
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle