MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379623968 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2005.a826674

Conversations with Lotman: Cultural Semiotics in Language, Literature, and Cognition by Edna Andrews (review)

2005· article· en· W4379623968 sur OpenAlex
David Shepherd

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Studies in Language
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmancipationSubjectivityPoliticsWritSociologyArtAestheticsArt historyHistoryPhilosophyEpistemologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

MLRy 100.3, 2005 885 yardstick' (p. 1). The issue of gender as cultural signifier is thus one of the foremost concerns in Colvin's evaluation of selected examples of each author's dramatic writ? ings, regardless of whether these were successful, either in terms of publication or of performance. This alone is an excellent aspect of the book, since it draws attention to many worthwhile dramatic works which have failed to receive the critical attention they deserve. In six chapters Colvin brings together plays which share certain gender concerns, albeit more often than not their approach is radically divergent. Under the heading 'Experiments in Dramatic Writing' she offersan interesting evaluation of Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach's Maria Stuart, Marie Roland, and Das Waldfrdulein, as well as her struggle to have these plays performed at the Viennese Burgtheater. They are set alongside the intriguing, but now virtually forgotten, Helene Druskowitz and her self-abasing play Die Emancipations-Schwdrmerin. In another chapter, entitled 'The Gender of Creativity', a comparison of the Kiinstlerdramen of Julie Kiihn, Elsa Bernstein-Porges, Mathilde Paar, Gertrud Prellwitz, and Anna Croissant-Rust is developed in terms of the authors' acceptance or rejection, as the case may be, of 'male' notions of artistic value. Similarly Colvin initiates her discussion of the political plays of Marie Eugenie delle Grazie, Lu Marten, and Berta Lask with the question to what extent 'these three dramatists are prepared to sideline ideas about women's subjectivity and emancipation to portray the emancipation ofthe (primarily male) worker' (p. 103). In these political plays by women Colvin's preoccupation with gender issues seems somewhat misplaced. It is true that Berta Lask, for example, in her drama Leuna 1921, does focus primarily on the male worker's experience, but this was inevitable since the play was an explicit record of the ill-fated revolt of the Leuna workers in 1921. One might remember, in this context, that in her earlier piece Befreiung Lask did place women's experience at the centre of the action. Surely it is not reasonable to expect every play by a woman to focus upon the woman's angle or issues of gender? The last two chapters focus on Else Lasker-Schuler and Marieluise Fleisser. Both discussions are well anchored in the critical debate, past and present, which surrounds their work and Colvin here succeeds in opening up further angles of understanding. Her reading of Lasker-Schuler's Die Wupper and of Arthur Aronymus, in particular, shows a shrewd awareness ofthe 'metalevel of humor' (p. 132) as an all-important subversive dimension in the plays. Where the work of Marieluise Fleisser is con? cerned, Colvin is in agreement with critics such as Elke Briins that these plays are 'peculiarly corporeal' (p. 160), and she suggests, convincingly, that the visceral di? mension of Fleisser's plays reaches beyond the body to become manifest in a language and a discourse which are displayed outside and beyond the patriarchal realm. Ulti? mately, this is the endeavour which operates as the touchstone against which, in the conclusion, the dramatic writings of all the playwrights discussed in earlier chapters are situated. University of Kent Agnes Cardinal Conversations withLotman: Cultural Semiotics in Language, Literature, and Cognition. By Edna Andrews. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University ofToronto Press. 2003. xvi + 204pp. ?32. ISBN 0-8020-3686-4. Edna Andrews makes it clear from the outset that the aim of this book is not to lionize Iurii Lotman: The reader will not find an attempt to construct a cult of personality around Lotman or to use him to deconstruct other theorists of his day, either in the Soviet Union or 886 Reviews abroad: Lotman and his work constitute but one portion of the larger fabric of our analysis and exploration of complex questions encompassing dynamic modelling of human language, cross-cultural enquiry, and the relationship between cultural systems and other symbolic systems with which they intersect?especially human languages and the construction of individual and collective cultural memory. (p. xv) The three parts into which the book is divided (' Lotman's Cultural Semiotic Theory', 'The Construction of Semiotic Space in Verbal Texts', and 'Semiotic Theory as a Cognitive Science') reflectand confirm...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,622
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,468

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle