MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379624114 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2004.a826813

Mother Tongues and Other Reflections on the Italian Language by Giulio Lepschy (review)

2004· article· en· W4379624114 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHebrewFirst languageVitalityHistoryStyle (visual arts)Variety (cybernetics)CriticismLiteratureSociologyClassicsLinguisticsArtPhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1068 Reviews giorno, and ones produced furtherafield, such as the Canadian L'arvista dl'academia, concentrating mainly on Piedmontese linguistics through the medium of the dialect. In Canada too, as well as in the United States, apart from the rich selection of more traditional periodicals, we have those devoted to Italo-Canadian and Italo-American culture: ltalian Canadiana, ltalian Americana, and Voices in ltalian Americana. A small criticism: I feltthe need for a full index of all the periodicals mentioned. University College London Laura Lepschy Mother Tongues and Other Reflections on theltalian Language. By Giulio Lepschy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2002. x+148 pp. ?15. ISBN 0-80203729 -1. Mother Tongues and Other Reflections on the ltalian Language is a collection of six scholarly essays by Giulio Lepschy, including the contents ofthe Goggio Public Lec? tures which the author delivered at the University of Toronto in the autumn of 2000. In his elegant though unpretentious style, Lepschy analyses some fundamental issues in the history of the ltalian language and culture. In Chapter 1 Lepschy considers the notion of 'mother tongue' vis-d-vis that of 'li? terary language' in both diachronic and theoretical terms. Before becoming a mother tongue, ltalian existed for centuries as a literary language. Lepschy compares its his? tory with that of Latin and Hebrew, and raises a number of interesting questions on the birth and death of languages, and on the concept of native competence. Chapter 2 is concerned with linguistic variety in Italy, the surprising vitality of the dialects, and possible future developments in the light of recent changes in ltalian society and culture. The author addresses the controversial issue ofthe legislationon the protection of the minoranze linguistichestoriche. Even though the practical consequences of this legislation remain to be seen, Lepschy expresses a hope that itwill contribute to help the communities concerned and to spread information on their culture. The much-discussed topic of italiano popolare is revisited in a historical perspec? tive in Chapter 3. For decades popular ltalian was unitary in its aims, though not in its features, which were principally derived from the only idiom mastered by native speakers of dialect. Lepschy points out how the influence of the mass media, in the last fiftyyears, has resulted in the rise of a truly unitary and popular code: the everyday language ofthe whole population. In Chapter 4, a proposal is put forward on a relatively obscure aspect of ltalian phonology, secondary stress, in the light of the correlation between the structure of lexical compounds, main and secondary stress or prominence, and the neutralization (or lack thereof) of the phonological opposition between mid-high [e]~[o] and midlow [s]~[d]. Probably the most compelling theme ofMother Tongues is Lepschy's passionate de? fence of the relatedness of literature and linguistics. In the opening pages the author declares: 'It is my belief that, although the two approaches, the linguistic and the literary, are distinct, they can only gain from being linked, and in some cases they inevitably suffer from being kept apart' (p. 3). This belief finds its most eloquent and convincing expression in the final two essays. Chapter 5 is a lucid and detailed analysis of La Veniexiana, a Venetian play which the author considers to be 'in many ways the most striking [. . .] ofthe ltalian Renaissance' (p. 93). The uncovering of a crucial linguistic detail sheds new light on the role of the female characters in the play: the women are those who take the initiative, and thus the traditional gender roles are turned upside down. Only specialist knowledge of Old Venetian has allowed the discovery of this detail, and, as a consequence, the appreciation of the true cul? tural significance of the play. Lepschy's reinterpretation of La Veniexiana is inspired MLR, 99.4, 2004 1069 by a comment by Carlo Dionisotti, one of the greatest Italian literary and linguistic scholars of all time. It is to this figure that the author dedicates a superb memoir (the final chapter), combining personal and professional detail, and expressing great admiration for an extraordinary scholar and an uncompromisingman. Both the student of Italian and the specialist in linguistics or literature will find this book highly...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,694
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,446

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle