MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379649800 · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.1331

POS1398-HPR SUPPORT NEEDED BY PEOPLE WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS TO REMAIN IN THE WORKFORCE

2023· article· en· W4379649800 sur OpenAlexaff
Janet L. Poole, K. Carandang, Mary Thelander Hill, Abigail L. Koch, Pam Rogers, Diane Lacaille

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaResearch Canada
Organismes subventionnairesAnkara Universitesi
Mots-clésMedicineWorkforceMultiple sclerosisIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Systemic sclerosis (SSc) severely limits one’s ability to participate in paid employment, which may threaten an individual’s economic, social, physical, or mental well-being. No programs and very little resources exist to help people with SSc remain in the work force despite the high prevalence of work disability. The few programs that do exist were developed for persons with other rheumatic conditions. One evidence-based program, Making it WorkTM (MIW), has the potential to be adapted to meet the specific work related problems faced by people with SSc. Objectives This study identified challenges in the work environment and supports received or desired by persons with SSc as a preliminary step to identify adaptations that could make the MIWTM more relevant to people with SSc. Methods Participants were recruited through virtual communication from the National Scleroderma Foundation and word of mouth to participate in one 2-hour virtual focus group. Participants were >18 years of age, currently employed or stopped work in the past 5 years, United States residents, English-speaking, and self-reported a diagnosis of SSc and that SSc affected their work ability. Participants were first asked about difficulties working with SSc. The facilitator created a list of challenges based on initial discussion, then participants identified the top five most important challenges according to their experience. Participants were then asked about supports received or desired to help maintain employment. Focus group notes and transcripts were analyzed to determine challenges and supports that must be addressed in an employment intervention for people with SSc. Results The sample included 14 participants (85.7% women, mean age 48.8±10.1 years, mean disease duration 7.7±7.4 years; 78.6% had diffuse SSc). 71.4% had college degrees and 71.4% were employed full time. 42.9% described their jobs as having mostly mental demands while 35.7% had both physical and mental demands. Important challenges prioritized by the most participants were: 1) challenges with physical tasks, particularly related to hand use [11, 78.6%] –“My hands are pretty messed up; typing is a challenge”; 2) fatigue [9, 64.3%]-“When you say fatigue, people are like, “Well, go take a power nap,” but that’s not what it is. I could sleep 12-hours and still be exhausted”; 3) mental and emotional health, related to coping with how the unpredictability of SSc affects the body, identity, and employment [8, 57.1%]-“This disease does not just knock us down one time or challenge us on one level. It’s like one body system after another.”“You have to deal with the issues of your self-esteem, feeling like you’re different than everybody else, mourning that loss of ability or career or work ethic that you had prior to your diagnosis” Participants identified a variety of individualized strategies that enabled them to overcome challenges with SSc at work, including ways to plan ahead, adaptive equipment, and strategies to adapt job tasks. However, participants emphasized that in order to use these tools, it is most helpful to: 1) have the knowledge and advocacy skills to know what to ask for; 2) feel confident that asking for support or accommodations in the workplace will lead to a beneficial change; and 3) be able to problem solve with others (e.g., clinicians, work-related program, therapists, support group). Conclusion This study identified the prominent barriers and supports to employment from the perspectives of patients with SSc. While there is some overlap with issues reported by persons with other rheumatic conditions, there are also SSc-specific concerns. This information will be used to adapt the MIWTM intervention, and warrants further consideration for how to incorporate better supports in healthcare, workplaces, and vocational counseling for people with SSc. REFERENCES: NIL. Acknowledgements: NIL. Disclosure of Interests None Declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,247
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,826

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2470,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases→Travaux en français237 207→