Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds by David C. Pollock and Ruth E. Van Reken Raising Global Nomads by Robin Pascoe Barbara Schaetti and Lois J. Bushong The Global Nomad's Guide to University Transition by Tina L. Quick (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
issn 0362-4021 © 2015 Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society group, Vol. 39, No. 2, Summer 2015 173 1 Correspondence should be addressed to Xiaojue Hu, MD, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: Xiaojue.Hu@ nyumc.org. Book Review Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds. By David C. Pollock and Ruth E. Van Reken. Revised edition. Boston: Nicholas Brealey, 2009, 308 pp. Raising Global Nomads. By Robin Pascoe, with contributions from Barbara Schaetti and Lois J. Bushong. Vancouver: Expatriate Press, 2006, 229 pp. The Global Nomad’s Guide to University Transition. By Tina L. Quick. London: Summertime, 2010, 269 pp. Reviewed by Xiaojue Hu1 A new generation of globalized citizens is pursuing psychotherapy for help with identity exploration and complex acculturation problems. In addition to traditional immigrants, there is a subgroup of hidden immigrants: young cosmopolitan Americans who spent their formative years in ex-pat communities overseas. Reentry and repatriation into American society prove to be uniquely problematic and more difficult than anticipated. Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds by David C. Pollock and Ruth E. Van Reken is an excellent tour guide to the psychic terrain of these young adult internationals of the twenty-first century. Written for parents, Robin Pascoe’s Raising Global Nomads also allows the psychotherapist to gain insight into the emotional experience and family dynamics of so-called third-culture kids. Last, Tina L. Quick’s The Global Nomad’s Guide to University Transition distills much of the preceding wisdom into college-specific tips perfect to recommend to international students who are struggling with the adjustment to the distinct culture of the American university itself. 174 hu According to Pollock and Van Reken’s foundational text, the term third-culture kid (TCK) was originally coined by social scientists Ruth Hill Useem and John Useem in the 1950s to describe a person who has spent a significant part of his or her developmental years outside the parents’ culture. The TCK builds relationships to all of the cultures, while not having full ownership in any. Although elements from each culture are assimilated into the TCK’s life experience, the sense of belonging is in relationship to others of the same background. (p. 13) An example of the typical TCK biography might be someone who is born to a White American mother and a Black African father, spends his childhood in Hawaii and Indonesia, and then goes to college in the United States. Sound familiar? All three books use Barack Obama as perhaps the most famous TCK example to further emphasize how people of such culturally complex backgrounds will indeed be “the prototype citizens of the future.” Initially, TCK were synonymous with the children of missionaries, Foreign Service workers, and the military. Third culture is not to be equated with third world here, however. The first culture was originally considered the passport country of the parents, while the second culture is the host country where the family may be stationed and where the child will have spent significant portions of his or her developmental life. The third culture then becomes that of the expatriate lifestyle, or an “interstitial culture” of people who have a nomadic lifestyle in common. Pollock and Van Reken also introduce the concept of the CCK, or cross-cultural kid, as someone who grows up in a profoundly culturally mixed environment, such as the children of immigrants, refugees, and/or bicultural or biracial marriages, who share many of the characteristics of the TCK profile. Regardless of the acronyms used, a culturally complex heritage has significant, unique psychological ramifications. As Pollock and Van Reken explain, and the other two books echo, the TCK is someone who may seem mature beyond his or her years, has an expanded worldview, and speaks multiple languages fluently. He or she may also be adept at adapting to new environments, may make new friends easily, and can be especially effective at building bridges between different cultures. Such strengths are easily recognized as an undoubtedly positive heritage of the global lifestyle, but what is so noteworthy about Pollock and Van Reken’s book is its parallel exploration of the possible...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».