Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Suffrage Elimination Dance Mary Chapman I hope that by celebrating the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, we can convince all voters of the importance of not taking this right for granted. Voter turnout in the United States is among the lowest in the free world. Less than 56 percent of the voting-age population voted in the 2016 presidential election, and while that turnout represented a slight improvement over the turnout for 2012, it was a worse turnout than for the 2008 election. We should be very worried about what low turnout could mean for the presidential election this fall. When I teach classes about the suffrage movement in my classrooms, some students “zone out.” Their resigned faces seem to say: “Who cares?” “Suffrage is a minor movement.” “Big deal.” So I play a game with them, based on a 1950s party game called the “Elimination Dance.” In an “Elimination Dance,” a dance caller would announce certain criteria and the dancers who met those criteria would have to sit down: “All those wearing blue socks? Sit down!” “All those whose names begin with A? Sit down!” The dancers left standing at the end are the “winners.” I ask students who are willing to play the game to stand up. Then, I call out the groups that were not eligible to vote a century ago in my jurisdiction and ask students belonging to those groups to sit down: in British Columbia, Canada, these include women, Indigenous/First Nations/Native Canadians, people of Asian ancestry, and many, many more. I don’t have to call out all the criteria that applied one hundred years ago—for example, people under twenty-five and people without $500 worth of property—because after I’ve asked students belonging to the first three or four groups to sit down, in a class of 150 students, there might only be four or five left standing. These people would be the class’s only voters if we lived before women agitated to expand the franchise. And in part because of the precedent of suffragists’ efforts to enfranchise women, other disenfranchised groups were gradually recognized over the next few decades. When I played this game during the 2015 Canadian Federal election, students were astounded and followed me in droves when I announced that I was heading to a poll station set up on campus, where students living away from home could fill out ballots for whichever constituency they were eligible to vote in—an experimental initiative by Elections Canada. Try the Elimination Dance in your classrooms on Election Day! [End Page 302] Mary Chapman University of British Columbia Copyright © 2021 University of Nebraska Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».