Jordan's Principle: The Struggle to Access On-Reserve Health Care for High-Needs Indigenous Children in Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Jordan's PrincipleThe Struggle to Access On-Reserve Health Care for High-Needs Indigenous Children in Canada Lori Chambers (bio) and Kristin Burnett (bio) Beginning in the late 1950s, the federal and provincial governments of Canada introduced legislation intended to provide hospital and insured medical services for all Canadians. With the passage of the Medical Care Act in 1966 these services were extended to include all hospital care and medically necessary services. All services were to be informed by five principles: universality, comprehensiveness, public administration, portability, and accessibility.1 This health care system is protected by federal law and administered by the provinces and territories. However, despite these five principles, many services remain difficult to obtain. Governments are cost-conscious, and decision making within the health care system and in health care policy making is not always about the best interests of individual patients.2 This is particularly true with regard to expensive in-home services such as those required for the care of children with special needs.3 These problems are particularly acute for Indigenous people living on reserves in Canada. The unequal and different treatment of First Nations children and Indigenous people more generally is enshrined in the legal and constitutional foundations of Canada and results in disproportionately high rates of poverty and diseases of poverty.4 The federal government is responsible for those deemed to be "Indians" under the Indian Act, but provincial governments are responsible for health and social services, leaving a service gap for people on-reserve. Among those who suffer are children with special needs who live on-reserve. The structural inequalities within Canada's health care system were embodied in the 2005 death of five-year-old Jordan Rivers Anderson, a Cree child from Norway House Cree Nation. Norway House Cree Nation [End Page 101] is a reserve located almost 500 kilometers north of Winnipeg, Manitoba, with a population of 6,918 on-reserve members.5 Jordan suffered from Carey Fineman Ziter Syndrome, a neurological disorder, and spent the first two years of his life in a Winnipeg hospital. When his condition improved, doctors determined that "he could leave the hospital to receive care in a home tailored to his medical needs," but the federal government refused funding for the necessary renovations of his family home. Norway House Cree Nation raised money for a van to transport Jordan to various community and family activities, but costs with regard to "transportation to medical appointments, special food, and even a $30 showerhead" were disputed between the federal and provincial governments, and Jordan remained in the hospital pending the resolution of these arguments. Jordan died in hospital.6 Jordan's mother, who had moved to Winnipeg to be with her son, was overcome by grief and died only a few months after Jordan.7 Following Jordan's death, his family and supporters rallied to force the federal government to provide ongoing health services and care for on-reserve children with special needs. In response to this public pressure, in 2007 the federal government adopted Jordan's Principle. This principle asserts that when an Indigenous child requires care, the government of first contact should pay up front and that jurisdictional disputes should be resolved after care is provided.8 In order for Jordan's Principle to come into effect, however, it needed to be ratified by provincial and territorial governments. This has not happened, and federal and provincial governments have failed to implement the policy. In recent legal disputes, the federal government has defended policies that harm Indigenous children with special needs by spending tax dollars fighting First Nation organizations, band councils, and individual parents over funding. Ongoing battles between federal and provincial governments prevent health care in Canada from being universal, comprehensive, publicly administered, portable, and accessible, despite the principles enshrined in the Medical Care Act. This article uses the story of Jordan's Principle to illustrate how the federal system has ensured that Indigenous people generally and on-reserve Indigenous children specifically remain without access to basic medical services. First, we briefly sketch the breadth of the social and economic inequities that exist for Indigenous peoples in Canada and how those inequities translate into...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle