MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379803948 · doi:10.1353/nai.2022.a863585

No Surrender: The Land Remains Indigenous by Sheldon Krasowski (review)

2022· article· en· W4379803948 sur OpenAlex
Paulina Johnson

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSurrenderIndigenousTreatyNegotiationLawGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceSociologyEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: No Surrender: The Land Remains Indigenous by Sheldon Krasowski Paulina Johnson (bio) No Surrender: The Land Remains Indigenous by Sheldon Krasowski University of Regina Press, 2019 WRITTEN BY NON-INDIGENOUS SCHOLAR Sheldon Krasowski, No Surrender: The Land Remains Indigenous details the negotiations during the Numbered Treaties, focusing specifically on the first seven Treaties of the eleven in Canada. Krasowski's main argument is that the Canadian government through its crown negotiators misled the Indigenous nations they wanted to build relations with because Canada wanted land and these Treaty territories stretch across Manitoba to Alberta today. Chapter 1 examines Treaties 1 and 2, and how outside promises made by crown negotiators in the negotiations were left out of the written texts, but the "cede, release, surrender, and yield up" clause was added without Indigenous knowledge (72). Chapter 2 challenges the previous Treaty research that relied heavily on the unbiased use of Treaty texts by crown officials and ignored Indigenous oral narratives and eyewitness accounts of negotiations. This bias benefits the crown and the Government of Canada as it limited the glimpse into the ceremonial aspects of Treaty 3 and, more importantly, Indigenous philosophical and economic views of natural resources and land. Chapter 3 presents the "conflicts" between the Cree and Saulteaux Nations during Treaties 4 and 5, but as Krasowski points out, these conflicts were not about Indigenous animosity toward one another but about the Hudson's Bay Company's (HBC) impact on their territory. Tensions over ownership of land were prevalent at the time, which increased with the Cypress Hills Massacre, which led Canada to form the North-West Mounted Police (NWMP) in 1873. Chapter 4 examines the negotiations of Treaty 6 and the discontent among the Cree Nations in Saskatchewan, where political tensions were high concerning access to land and ownership. This is one of the first negotiations [End Page 124] where missionaries, the NWMP, and interpreters were in attendance, as only three missionaries had witnessed the prior treaty negotiations. Chapter 5 focuses on the 1877 negotiations of the Treaty 7 at Blackfoot Crossing with the Siksika, Piikani, Kainai, Tssu T'ina, and Stoney Nations. The chapter details the negative impacts of the American whiskey trade within their territory and how the creation of the NWMP protected their territories. The concluding chapter forwards the interrelations between Treaty 1 through Treaty 7 as much literature focuses on each separate Treaty, but together we are aware of the negotiation strategies that discuss only the "benefits of treaty" and "ignore[s] its liabilities" (272). Indigenous peoples and settlers understood the importance of a treaty relationship, but Canada had no interest in maintaining the relationships entailed by the Treaties. Krasowski calls into question scholars overuse of treaty texts, yet he defends the documents when statements made by Indigenous academics refer to them as "lies on paper" (citing Venne 1997, 212). Can you blame Indigenous peoples for having such a view when written and official documents have been disingenuous and deceitful? These were not just political agreements; they are representations of Indigenous livelihood. Unfortunately, Krasowski does not mention Indigenous women; this work still falls within the heteropatriarchal view of Canadian history. Lack of recognition of the role that women play in Indigenous societies replicates the patterns of sociopolitical misrecognition carried out by the Crown and state during the treaty negotiations. Krasowski also does not incorporate concepts of Indigenous kinship or reciprocity, both of which are important for the maintenance of relationships. There is mention of oral narratives and eyewitness accounts, yet these are significantly limited. The spiritual importance of the pipes used in the negotiations are only referenced at the end of the book. Cree scholar Winona Wheeler acknowledges in her foreword that Krasowski was an accomplice to the integration of Indigenous oral narratives rather than just written texts on the Treaties because "the more evidence, the stronger the case" (xiv), yet the incorporation of Indigenous spiritual philosophies on Treaties are lacking, and this evidence has more merit than any settler text. For those who do not know the complexity of Indigenous and settler relations extending from the Treaties, No Surrender does provide a look into Canada's emergence based on the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,568
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle