MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379804691 · doi:10.1353/cop.2016.0013

The 2015 Inaugural Shanghai Experimental Xiqu (Chinese Indigenous Theater) Festival, December 1–6

2016· article· en· W4379804691 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josh Stenberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueCHINOPERL · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousPerforming artsNarrativeBeijingHistoryVisual artsArtChinaLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PERFORMANCE REVIEW: THE 2015 INAUGURAL SHANGHAI EXPERIMENTAL XIQU (CHINESE INDIGENOUS THEATER) FESTIVAL, DECEMBER 1–6 JOSH STENBERG University of British Columbia, Canada A consistent forum for the presentation of xiqu 戲曲 (Chinese indigenous theater) in “little theatre” (xiaojuchang小劇場) form (translated as “experimental” on all promotional material for the Shanghai festival) is overdue. Pretty much the entirety of the xiqu world is in agreement that xiqu arts and audiences have long been in crisis. There is perhaps an element of ideological determinism in this narrative— on-its-last-legs is a default story for tradition anywhere—but there can be no doubt that troupes face a rapidly-changing policy environment and pressure to experiment and modernize. How they should do this, and where the bounds of such reforms should be set, are questions which continue to drive the work of xiqu practitioners, and their interaction with spoken theater and foreign artists. “Little theatre,” a term usually associated with Taiwanese spoken theater and lately with non-official PRC spoken theater (huaju 話劇) performance, is one option for xiqu troupes, especially given the bloatedness and complacency of many gala xiqu productions. To date, for two years running, festivals of “little theatre” xiqu plays lasting at least a month that involved at least 12 plays and fifty performances have been held in Beijing.1 The festival under review, whose Chinese title was Xiqu huxi: 2015 Shanghai xiaojuchang xiqu jie 戲曲呼吸: 2015 上海小劇場戲曲節 (Let Chinese indigenous theater breathe: The 2015 Shanghai small theater Chinese indigenous theater festival) was smaller (six plays and seven performances) and shorter in length (only a week). Plans are in the works for the 2016 edition. 1 For a survey of the development of “little theater” xiqu beginning from the late twentieth century through the first of the Beijing festivals, see Xie Boliang 謝柏梁, “Dangdai ‘xiaojuchang xiqu’ de fasheng yu fazhan—Zhongguo shiyanxing xiqu puxi zhi shuli 當代 ‘小劇場戲曲’ 的發 生與發展—中國實驗性戲曲譜系之梳理 (The birth and development of contemporary ‘little theater xiqu’—Sorting out the genealogy of Chinese experimental xiqu),” Xiju 戲劇 2 (2015): 91–103. Reportage on the second festival is comparatively hard to find. Liu Ping 劉平, “Xiaojuchang de shiyan yu chuangxin 小劇場的實驗與創新 (Experimentation and innovation in little theater),” Xiju wenxue 戲劇文學 (Theater literature) 2016.3: 8–11, was written in response to the discussion of “little theater” xiqu at a final symposium (zongjie luntan 總結論壇) that concluded the second festival. For the promotional material of the Beijing festivals, “black box” was used to translate xiaojuchang. See, for example, the advertisement for the second festival in the 2016.2 issue of Juben 劇本 (Play scripts). CHINOPERL: Journal of Chinese Oral and Performing Literature 35.1 (July 2016): 64–69© The Permanent Conference on Chinese Oral and Performing Literature, Inc. 2016 DOI 10.1080/01937774.2016.1183329 The festival opened with The Polished Jade Guanyin (Nianyu Guanyin 碾玉觀音) from the Beijing Jingju Company (Bejing Jingju yuan 北京京劇院). The piece is an adaptation by the young writer-director Li Zhuoqun 李卓群 of a vernacular story that appears under this title in an incomplete collection of stories first published by Miu Quansun 繆荃孫 (1844–1919) in 1915 that Miu claimed was based on a Yuan copy but which many scholars think he actually fabricated by making use of material from the original editions (published from 1620–27) of Feng Menglong’s 馮夢龍 (1574–1646) three collections of vernacular stories, which had become rare books by 1915.2 It is an excellent story, and eminently suitable for xiqu adaptation, one might think. The plot concerns the forbidden love between a great jade worker and his embroiderer beloved, sold into the service of the powerful and titled Han Shizhong 韓世忠 (1089–1151). They run away from Han’s mansion but are pursued and persecuted by Han’s henchman. She is ultimately killed but as a ghost is able to take her vengeance and lead her husband into eternal love in the other world. In between are cross-dressing disguises, a pregnancy, indecent overture repelled, and any number of declarations of love. The attempt to compress this much plot into a show that runs under two hours leads to breakneck pacing—hardly a common xiqu feature. More problematic is that neither of the lead actors is compelling , there is no chemistry between them, and the show felt under...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,730
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCHINOPERLMême sujetHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsTravaux en français237 207