MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379804818 · doi:10.1353/nor.2000.a799223

Argonauts of the North

2000· article· en· W4379804818 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth O. Bjork

Notice bibliographique

RevueNorwegian-American Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSound (geography)FisheryArchaeologyBayGovernorHistoryFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyOceanographyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1 Argonauts of the North by Kenneth O. Bjork Although Norwegian Americans in general showed little interest in Alaska prior to the depression beginning in 1893, to fishermen in the Pacific Northwest it was familiar territory at an earlier date. Scandinavians in Astoria, Oregon, were hired in the early 1890s to work in the Alaskan fisheries during the summer months. One of them, L. O. Belland, wrote in 1890 of the fine quality and abundance offish, especially salmon, "up north" and described the activities of canneries in Bristol Bay. Captain E. L. Skog sailed north each year on a four-month trip to fish for cod in the Bering Sea. He was skipper of the Puget Sound Alaska Commercial Company s schooner Moonlight, one of the firm's organizers, and director of its operations at Mukilteo, Washington. Similarly, Norwegian sealers out ofVictoria, Vancouver Island, often visited Alaska. Others, with no personal interest in drawing their countrymen to Alaska, saw great possibilities for Scandinavians in the territory . A prominent Swedish American, John Lind, then a member of Congress and later governor of Minnesota, wrote in the spring of 1892 of a visit to Puget Sound and British Columbia and of his association in Washington, D.C. with Dr. Leonard Stejneger, a brilliant Norwegian ornithologist with the Smithsonian Institution. In a letter to Skandinaven in April, he discussed a common Scandinavian interest in Alaska and urged persons with capital to look into the possibilities for profitable investments along the west coast and 3 4 Kenneth O. Bjork in Alaska. Lind also enclosed a letter from Dr. Stejneger that was actually a detailed report on the special attractions from Alaska, which the ornithologist knew well from having lived there, written for immigrants from Sweden and Norway. Southeastern Alaska, in particular, he maintained, resembled their homeland and contained riches in the form of gold, fish, and furs. Stejneger was convinced that Alaska one day would have a relatively dense population, and that persons from the coastal regions in northern Europe were best suited for life there. But in the early 1890s it was virgin territory, resembling Scandinavia "when our ancestors landed there." The land would have to be cleared, but "in an age of steam and electricity, it would require only decades for what then took centuries, and the yield would be greater and more gratifying." Skandinaven gave strong editorial support to the suggestions of Lind and Stejneger and added that Scandinavians could be lords in the North - but it would be well for them to have some capital. When a businessman like H. C. Wahlberg of Seattle discussed Alaska in early 1893, he saw profits in fish - to Norwegians the most readily extracted form of wealth. The territory, he reasoned, would become the Lofoten Islands and Finnmark of the New World. The best way to begin realizing this goal, he thought, was to start a Norwegian or Scandinavian colony in southeastern Alaska warmed by the Japan Current as Norway was warmed by the Gulf Stream. He proposed a meeting inTacoma or Seatde to explore the possibility of a settlement and suggested that, in addition to fishermen , it should have sailors, farmers, loggers, coopers, and other artisans . If ten or twenty such men - each with cash in the amount of $500 - would go to Alaska together, they could do very well for themselves. They should choose a committee of four or five men to work out the rules for a colony, decide basic business matters, and hunt out a suitable location. They should secure a good ship, find a desirable site, and return by fall, when a cooperative program could be worked out. Such views were confirmed in part by William A. Kjellman (Kjellmann), who in the employ of the American government went to Alaska in 1894 in charge of a group of Norwegian Sami chosen to train Eskimos in the reindeer culture. He explained that Argonauts of the North 5 twenty-two canneries were annually packing 646,000 cases of salmon, and that the salmon and halibut industries were monopolies owned by companies with large capital reserves. There was, he wrote, "no prospect at all that a private individual would be able to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,143
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,377
Écart entre enseignants0,337 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNorwegian-American StudiesMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207