MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379804935 · doi:10.1353/fro.2012.a483541

Artemisia Challenges the Elders: How a Women Artists' Cooperative Created a Community for Feminism and Art Made by Women

2012· article· en· W4379804935 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joanna Gardner‐Huggett

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers A Journal of Women Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArt, Politics, and Modernism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStudioFeminismArtArt historyVisual artsPerformance artSociologyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Artemisia Challenges the Elders:How a Women Artists' Cooperative Created a Community for Feminism and Art Made by Women Joanna Gardner-Huggett (bio) In the early 1970s women's separatist art collectives like Artemisia in Chicago (1973-2003) played an essential role in supporting and nurturing the careers of a whole new generation of women artists. Artemisia was established in 1973 after Joy Poe, then a graduate student at the Art Institute of Chicago, visited AIR, the first woman's cooperative gallery in New York City, that May and concluded the same could be done in Chicago.1 Upon her return Poe enlisted the support of Barbara Grad, Phyllis MacDonald, Emily Pinkowski, and Margaret Wharton, and they formed an interview committee. Together they visited the studios of 150 women artists and then held a subsequent meeting of 40 women, where an additional 15 members were chosen: Phyllis Bramson, Shirley Federow, Sandra Gierke, Carol Harmel, Vera Klement, Linda Kramer, Susan Michod, Sandra Perlow, Claire Prussian, Nancy Redmond, Christine Rojek, Heidi Seidelhuber, Alice Shaddle, Mary Stoppert, and Carol Turchan.2 The gallery officially opened on September 21 at 226 East Ontario Street, placing it in the center of the contemporary art scene. The Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago (MCA), was located across the street, and the commercial galleries Phyllis Kind and Marianne Deson also occupied spaces in the same building.3 Further, Artemisia's immediate neighbor was ARC Gallery, a second women artists' cooperative, and they both sought to challenge the concept of the woman artist as a hobbyist and dilettante by providing a professional venue for their members.4 Taking their name from the seventeenth-century Italian Baroque painter Artemisia Gentileschi (1597-c. 1651), "whose best work had been credited to her father," the members of Artemisia were determined to make their own names known to the art world of Chicago and beyond.5 Artemisia Gentileschi did not merely serve as a namesake for the gallery. The art critic Franz Schulze noted that the members' appropriation of Gentileschi's depictions of heroines engaged in violent acts reflected the group's militant feminist stance in its early years.6 The artist's painting Judith and [End Page 55] Holofernes (1611-12) was used in a 1974 advertisement for a lecture by Judith Shamberg entitled "Attitudes and Obstacles: Women Artists in History." Therefore, it is worth considering briefly how the conflicts facing the female protagonists Gentileschi painted paralleled the societal conditions facing the Chicago women artists, ultimately stimulating the desire to form a community of women artists. Gentileschi's Susannah and the Elders (1610) derives from the Book of Susannah, a book of Apocrypha, where Susannah, who lives in Babylon, is bathing in her garden.7 She sends two maids to fetch oil and perfumes for her bath, and while she is left alone, two elders begin to spy on her. They soon demand that she submit to them sexually, and when Susannah refuses, they threaten to denounce her as an adulterer, a crime punishable by death. Susannah is quickly served this sentence after being falsely accused and eventually is vindicated when Daniel questions each of the elders separately, asking them under which tree Susannah seduced them. Each man names a different one, revealing Susannah's innocence.8 Just as Susannah resists sexual violence, the women who founded Artemisia were no longer willing to comply with their subjugation in the art world and understood that a feminist intervention would be necessary to disarm the masculine power that maintains patriarchal governance structures. By staging this protest, they also found themselves on trial like Susannah, framed as perpetrators rather than victims of the social order. As Jenni Sorkin observed, "Women who chose these routes faced stiff, if not severe social penalties for opting out of traditional social roles and normative behavior."9 The members' challenge, however, was not mounted by singular figures like Susannah; instead they created a collective force, as well as a physical space, where the binary structures that enforce women's subordinate status are eliminated. Therefore, Artemisia Gallery occupies what can be described as a "feminist location." As Martin Beck explains a women artists' cooperative, it understands space primarily as a contested...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,274
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,965

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers A Journal of Women StudiesMême sujetArt, Politics, and ModernismTravaux en français237 207