Women's Human Rights—and Religion

Women's Human Rights—and Religion Stephanie Y. Mitchem I was invited to give a paper at the Women, Religion, and Human Rights conference held in Sweden June 2011. Women and men from around the world, scholars from a variety of fields, gathered to share experiences and ideas. Two questions occurred to me at that event. Near the end of the conference, some of the participants began to define “religion.” I knew that many of the scholars attending the conference were from history or sociology or political science, some field other than religious studies or theology. If religionists’ absence indicated that theologians had ceded the arguments about human rights, this was very disturbing to me. After all, most religious traditions claim an anthropological view that humans have meaning beyond apparent economic or social value. It would seem that such a human rights focus could also have the added benefit of engendering deeper interfaith dialogues. Following this line of thought, my question was: “Why aren't more religion scholars thinking through issues of human rights and women?” Second, I was struck by the fact that I was one of the few Americans present. My second question became: “In a global conversation, why were so few Americans involved?” I'm aware that there is a belief that United States’ women are secure in their human rights. However, this belief is a fiction that, in global comparisons, is consistently proven untrue. The number of women in political leadership; the social efforts to end domestic violence; achieving equal pay and economic strength as well as the leadership of various religious bodies—in such markers as these, women in the United States do not take the lead among nations, but fall far down the list. We've long needed to have substantive conversations about these women and human rights from the perspectives of religious scholars. During and following that 2011 conference, women's status and well‐being in the United States were brought into sharp relief. Throughout the presidential election cycle, birth control and contraception were challenged by some church groups, using proposed legislation to outlaw each as a form of abortion. Religious freedom has been a battle cry that has served to reinscribe male dominance over women's bodies, and in doing so, reinforce the subsequent economic inequalities. Beyond the U.S., a recent book and documentary by Nicholas Kristoff and Sheryl LeDun, Half the Sky, brought a painful focus to global issues of women and human rights. And yet, we've long needed to have substantive conversations from the perspectives of religions about women's human rights. It is my hope that this issue of Crosscurrents will hold the beginnings of a longer conversation. The authors are from the United States as well as Ghana and Canada/Azerbaijan. Some are Muslims, some Christians, and some are atheist. Issues of rape, economic abuse, and domestic violence arise. But some of the authors challenge definitions of women, leadership, and women's human rights that come from other women, with the hope to broaden the conversations to encompass their own perspectives on religions and on human rights. Feminist or womanist, different races or nationalities, of various ages, the authors in this issue bring a commitment to finding answers that account for complex relationships and situations. These women add a new, political, and battle‐tested savvy to their discussions. The authors highlight women's agency in bringing forth revised thinking and direct action. For some of the authors, their own religious traditions offer beliefs that become important to their growth as women. For others, moving from a religious structure does not mean giving up humanist, human‐centered ethics. For each essay, the complexities of contemporary thought about women, especially from women, are highlighted. Their words help us to think more deeply about women and human rights and religions’ roles. Not just a topic for fruitless theorizing in seminaries’ classes that replaces the old “how many angels dance on the head of pin?” question. Not simply answered through legislation but recognizing complex, global layers that surround any issue of women and human rights. And not just an occasional focus for the activist work of a “Peace and Justice...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.