MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4379876477 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3026043/v1

Knowledge and Perception of  Adult Nigerian Men Towards Covid-19 Vaccination: A case study in Southwest Nigeria.

2023· preprint· en· W4379876477 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gideon Ojo

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMisinformationQuarter (Canadian coin)VaccinationPandemicDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PerceptionRisk perceptionDemographicsMedicinePsychologyFamily medicineGeographyDiseaseSociologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Corona virus illness 2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic event, began in the first quarter of 2020 and affected nearly every country on earth. Several researches on Covid-19 knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of religion in several Nigerian locations have been published. There is a scarcity of data on adult Nigerian men's perceptions and awareness of COVID-19 in relation to immunization. As a result, this study looks into the vaccination knowledge and attitudes of adult Nigerian men in south-west Nigeria. Methods The study is an analytic cross-sectional survey with structured online questionnaires Google form that was administered to the people of Oyo, Osun, and Lagos in Nigeria's south-western states. The study enlisted 309 participants, who were chosen at random after providing informed permission. The link between knowledge of COVID-19 and social demographics factors, knowledge of the vaccination, perception of the vaccine, and awareness and misinformation about COVID-19 was scored using percentages and subjects. The variable percentage scores were classified as good or poor. Chi-Square was utilized to determine independent determinants of COVID-19 knowledge and perception, and SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results According to the socio-demographic characteristics study, the mean age was 28.36.8 years, 52.4 percent of respondents were male, 28.5% were from Osun state, and (96.8%) had university education. 91.9% of responders had an excellent understanding of the COVID-19 vaccination. The general perception of the respondents was positive, with 240 (77.7%) of the respondents favoring the COVID-19 vaccination. The majority of respondents (88.3%) believe that developing a vaccine can aid in the fight against the pandemic, while 65.5% believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe based on what they know. Less than half of the respondents (45.6%) answered that if they knew the COVID-19 vaccination could influence their daily life activities after taking it, they would avoid taking it. They will still make themselves available for it, and the majority (64.1%) believe that COVID-19 will be successfully controlled with the vaccination. To the best of their knowledge, less than half of the respondents (44.0%) believe the Corona virus is a biological weapon designed by the Chinese government, while 15.2% believe it is a virus designed by the pharmaceutical industry to sell their drugs, and a similar (15.2%) believe the virus is an exaggeration by the news media to cause fear and panic. When asked how the virus is most commonly transmitted, 95.8% said they were exposed to airborne droplets through breathing, sneezing, or coughing, while 28.2% said they were exposed through kissing, hugging, sex, or other sexual contact. Another group of respondents (8.1%) indicated that HPV is spread by drinking contaminated water or eating infected food, while more than half (59.5%) stated that it can be spread by touching contaminated objects or surfaces. When asked how the virus can be prevented, fifty-six (18.1%) of respondents said that Africa's hot heat can prevent the transmission, while the majority (91.9%) said that frequent hand washing and social separation can. A few (6.8%) believe that consuming Chloroquine tablets and medicines can help avoid the illness. While fumigation and spraying bus stations and other public locations were mentioned as ways to prevent the virus by around one-third (31.4%) of those polled. Furthermore, twenty-seven (8.7%) listed ingesting gins, garlic, ginger, herbal mixture, traditional meals and soup as a means to prevent the infection. In terms of COVID-19 disease perception, the majority of respondents (90.6%) believed that it is possible to die from the Coronavirus, while a comparable proportion (89.6%) agreed that the complete meaning of COVID-19 is Corona Virus Disease 19. Conclusion This study found that national public health information advocacy and campaigns in Southwest Nigeria were extremely effective in increasing understanding of COVID-19 and decreasing beliefs about disinformation, immunization, and mass medication administration programs. However, more can be done using social media and telecommunication to combat disinformation about immunization in more Nigerian and African regions and rural settings.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,136
Tête enseignante GPT0,477
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Square→Même sujetVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→Travaux en français237 207→