PRIMARY OVERALL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED ZUMA‐7 STUDY OF AXICABTAGENE CILOLEUCEL VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: In ZUMA-7 (NCT03391466), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was superior to a chemotherapy-based standard of care (SOC; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.398; p < 0.0001) in the primary analysis of event-free survival (EFS) as second-line therapy in patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL; Locke et al. NEJM. 2022). In a preplanned interim analysis, median overall survival (OS) was numerically prolonged in the axi-cel arm (Locke et al. TCT 2022. Abstract 1). We now report the primary analysis of OS from ZUMA-7. Methods: Study procedures and eligibility were previously reported. The intention-to-treat (ITT) primary OS analysis occurred 5 years after the first patient was randomized (01/25/2018) per protocol. A log-rank test stratified by randomization stratification factors compared OS between the 2 arms. In addition to the ITT analysis, prespecified OS sensitivity analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding due to subsequent cellular immunotherapy in the SOC arm. Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment, OS in key subgroups, and safety. Exploratory analyses were conducted to determine the association between OS and axi-cel pharmacokinetics and product features. Results: In total, 359 patients were randomized, 180 to axi-cel and 179 to SOC. As of 01/25/2023, at a median follow-up of 47.2 mo, axi-cel demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS over SOC (HR: 0.726, 95% CI: 0.540–0.977; stratified log-rank 1-sided p = 0.0168 [efficacy boundary, 0.0249]). Median OS was prolonged with axi-cel versus SOC (not reached vs. 31.1 mo, respectively); 48-mo OS estimates were higher with axi-cel (54.6% vs. 46.0%, respectively). OS benefit with axi-cel versus SOC was consistent in prespecified key subgroups, including age ≥65 years, primary refractory, early relapse, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, and high second-line age-adjusted IPI. In the SOC arm, 102 (57%) patients received subsequent cellular immunotherapy off protocol. Prespecified OS sensitivity analyses showed an even greater OS benefit with axi-cel versus SOC, with stratified HR of 0.608 (95% CI: 0.449–0.824) by Rank-Preserving Structural Failure Time model. PFS by investigator confirmed benefit of axi-cel over SOC (HR: 0.506, 95% CI: 0.383–0.669), with 48-mo PFS estimates of 41.8% versus 24.4%, respectively. No new cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events and no new treatment-related deaths occurred since the primary EFS analysis. The safety profile of axi-cel remained consistent with prior studies. Improved OS was associated with an increased proportion of a naive T-cell phenotype (CCR7+CD45RA+ T cells, descriptive p < 0.05) in the infused product. Conclusions: Axi-cel as second-line therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival over chemotherapy-based SOC in patients with early relapsed/refractory LBCL. Keyword: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Encore Abstract—previously submitted to ASCO 2023 Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract J. R. Westin Consultant or advisory role: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, Kite, a Gilead Company, MorphoSys/Incyte, Monte Rosa, Novartis, Umoja Research funding: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, Kite, a Gilead Company, MorphoSys/Incyte, Monte Rosa, Novartis O. O. Oluwole Consultant or advisory role: Pfizer, Kite, a Gilead Company, Gilead, AbbVie, Janssen, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, Novartis, Epizyme, Curio Science, Nektar Therapeutics, Cargo Therapeutics, and Caribou Biosciences Honoraria: Kite, a Gilead Company, Pfizer, and Gilead Research funding: Kite, a Gilead Company, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Allogene M. J. Kersten Consultant or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Kite, a Gilead Company, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Adicet Bio, and Roche Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Kite, a Gilead Company, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Adicet Bio, and Roche Research funding: Kite, Roche, Takeda, and Celgene Travel grants: Kite, Miltenyi, Novartis, and Roche D. B. Miklos Consultant or advisory role: Janssen, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Miltenyi Honoraria: Janssen Research funding: Janssen Other remuneration: patents, royalties, other intellectual property as a cGVHD patent holder for ibrutinib as cGVHD therapy with no compensation; and travel and other support from Janssen M. A. Perales Consultant or advisory role: Cidara Therapeutics, Medigene, Sellas Life Sciences, and NexImmune Stock ownership: NexImmune, Omeros, and OrcaBio Honoraria: Adicet, Allovir, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Equilium, Exevir, Incyte, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Omeros, OrcaBio, Syncopation, VectivBio AG, and Vor Biopharma Research funding: Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Nektar Therapeutics, and Novartis A. Ghobadi Consultant or advisory role: Amgen, Atara, Bristol Myers Squibb, CRISPR Therapeutics, Kite, and Wugen Inc. Honoraria: Kite, a Gilead Company Research funding: Amgen, Genentech, and Kite A. Sureda Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Miltenyi, MSD, and Takeda Honoraria: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Genmab, Janssen, Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, MSD, and Pierre Fabre, Takeda Research funding: Takeda Travel grants: Kite and Takeda Other remuneration: speakers’ bureau participation for Takeda C. A. Jacobson Consultant or advisory role: Kite, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Instil Bio, ImmPACT Bio, Lonza, Ipsen, Epizyme bluebird bio, and Daiichi Sankyo Honoraria: Kite, a Gilead Company, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Instil Bio, ImmPACT Bio, Lonza, Ipsen, Epizyme, bluebird bio, and Daiichi Sankyo Research funding: Kite and Pfizer U. Farooq Consultant or advisory role: MorphoSys Honoraria: Caribou and Kite, a Gilead Company T. van Meerten Consultant or advisory role: Janssen and Kite Honoraria: Kite, a Gilead Company, Gilead Sciences, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb Research funding: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb and Genentech M. L. Ulrickson Consultant or advisory role: Gilead Sciences and Stemline M. Elsawy Consultant or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite, a Gilead Company, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite, a Gilead Company, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer L. A. Leslie Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eli Lilly, Epizyme, Janssen/J&J, Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Seagen, and TG Therapeutics Travel grants: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Epizyme, Kite, a Gilead Company, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Seagen, and TG Therapeutics Other remuneration: speakers' bureau participation for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Epizyme, Kite, a Gilead Company, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Seagen, and TG Therapeutics S. Chaganti Consultant or advisory role: Adicet Bio, Atara Bio, Incyte, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Orion Pharma Honoraria: Adicet Bio, Atara Bio, Incyte, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Orion Pharma Research funding: Atara Bio, Autolus, Genmab, Janssen, Kite, MorphoSys, and Novartis Travel grants: Kite, a Gilead Company, and Takeda Other remuneration: speakers’ bureau participation for Hartley Taylor, Incyte, Kite, a Gilead Company, and Takeda M. Dickinson Consultant or advisory role: Gilead Sciences, MSD, Novartis, and Roche Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, MSD, Novartis, and Roche Research funding: Novartis and Roche Other remuneration: speakers’ bureau participation for Gilead Sciences, MSD, Novartis, and Roche Y. Yang Employment or leadership position: Kite, a Gilead Company M. Schupp Employment or leadership position: Kite, a Gilead Company Stock ownership: Gilead Sciences C. To Employment or leadership position: Kite, a Gilead Company Stock ownership: Gilead Sciences F. L. Locke Consultant or advisory role: Allogene, Amgen, bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Calibr, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Cowen, ecoR1, Emerging Therapy Solutions, Gerson Lehman Group, GammaDelta Therapeutics, Iovance, Janssen, Kite, a Gilead Company, Legend Biotech, Novartis, Umoja, and Wugen Research funding: Allogene, Kite, and Novartis Other remuneration: patents, royalties, other intellectual property from several patents held by the institution in author’s name (unlicensed) in the field of cellular immunotherapy
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».