MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380084938 · doi:10.1002/hon.3163_95

GLOFITAMAB MONOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (<i>R</i>/<i>R</i>) LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA (LBCL): EXTENDED FOLLOW‐UP AND LANDMARK ANALYSES FROM A PIVOTAL PHASE II STUDY

2023· article· en· W4380084938 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael Dickinson, Carmelo Carlo‐Stella, Franck Morschhauser, Lorenzo Falchi, Emmanuel Bachy, Guillaume Cartron, Cyrus Khan, Monica Tani, Joaquín Martínez‐López, Nancy L. Bartlett, Antonio Salar, Joshua Brody, Sirpa Leppä, E. Mulvihill, Linda Lundberg, James Relf, Youhua Xie, Alessia Bottos, K. Humphrey, Martin Hutchings

Notice bibliographique

RevueHematological Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesKite PharmaF. Hoffmann-La RocheGenentechCelgeneGilead SciencesPharmacyclicsSanofiPfizerBristol-Myers Squibb
Mots-clésRefractory (planetary science)MedicineLymphomaOncologyInternal medicinePhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Glofitamab is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody delivered in a fixed course of 12 three-weekly cycles. In a Phase II study (NCT03075696), glofitamab induced high complete response (CR) rates and had manageable toxicity in pts with R/R LBCL (Dickinson et al., 2022). We present an extended follow-up and a landmark analysis to assess the outcomes of pts in CR. Methods: Pts with LBCL and ≥2 prior therapies received 1000 mg obinutuzumab pretreatment 7 days prior to the first glofitamab dose. IV glofitamab was given as step-up doses: 2.5 mg on Day (D) 1 of Cycle (C) 1, 10 mg on C1D8 and 30 mg (target dose) on D1 of C2–12 (21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed CR rate. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) post-hoc analyses were performed in responders (landmark for CR at C3 or end of treatment [EOT]). Results: As of 10 October 2022, 154 pts had received ≥1 dose of study treatment; baseline characteristics were as previously presented. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range: 2–7); 33% had received prior CAR T-cells and 85% were refractory to their most recent regimen. Median time on study was 20.1 months (range: 0–32). The investigator (INV)-assessed CR rate (BOR) was 38% (40% by IRC) and overall response rate was 59% (52% by IRC). CR rates were consistent in pts with and without prior CAR-Ts (37% vs. 39%). After a median follow-up of 18.3 months (range: 0–30) in pts with a CR (BOR), most CRs (39/59; 66%) were ongoing. Median duration of CR (DoCR) was 24.1 months (95% CI: 19.8–NE); an estimated 70% of pts with a CR at any time remained in remission at 18 months (Figure). The 18-month OS rate was 41% (95% CI: 32.1–49.3). Landmark analyses at 1 year in pts with a CR pre-C3 (PFS rate: 71%, OS rate: 92%) and in pts with a CR at EOT (PFS rate: 80%, OS rate: 94%) showed that most pts were progression free and alive. In a cohort of 101 pts treated with glofitamab doses below the recommended Phase II dose but ≥10 mg with longer median CR follow-up (31 months, range: 1–49), the median DoCR was 30.1 months (95% CI: 5.5–NE) and 55% of pts were still in remission at data cut-off. This further confirms the highly durable responses achieved with glofitamab. CRS (by ASTCT) remained the most common adverse event (AE), occurring in 64% of pts and was mostly Grade (Gr) 1 (48%) or Gr 2 (12%); Gr 3 (3%) and Gr 4 (1%) events were uncommon. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was stable compared with earlier analyses, with one new Gr 3 AE (acute kidney injury), one new Gr 2 neurologic AE (agitation) and no new glofitamab-related Gr 5 AEs reported. Encore Abstract—This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. The research was funded by: NP30179 is sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third-party medical writing assistance, under the direction of all authors, was provided by Dikeledi Matlebjane, MSc of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. © 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, immunotherapy Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract M. Dickinson Consultant or advisory role: Novartis, BMS, Gilead, Roche, Janssen, Abbvie, Genmab Honoraria: Roche, Amgen, MSD, Janssen, BMS, Novartis, Gilead, Abbvie Research funding: Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Celgene, MSD, Abbvie, Lilly Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Roche C. Carlo-Stella Employment or leadership position: Humanitas University Consultant or advisory role: Sanofi, ADC Therapeutics, Karyopharm Tx, Celgene/BMS, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Scenic Biotech, Novartis Honoraria: Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Roche, Janssen Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Astra-Zeneca, Gilead Research funding: Sanofi, ADC Therapeutics, Roche Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Takeda, Janssen Oncology F. Morschhauser Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Gilead, AbbVie Other remuneration: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees—Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Genmab, Miltenyi, Allogenetherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Janssen L. Falchi Consultant or advisory role: Genmab, Abbvie, Roche/Genentech, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca Research funding: Roche, Genmab, Genentech Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Genmab E. Bachy Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, Roche, Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Takeda, Incyte Research funding: Amgen, BMS Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte G. Cartron Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Celgene, Mabqi, MedxCell Honoraria: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, Roche, Abbvie, Novartis Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Roche C. Khan Consultant or advisory role: Beigene, Astrazeneca, Morphosys Honoraria: Roche, Astrazenca, Beigene, SeaGen, Abbvie, JNJ, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, Karyopharm, GSK, Morphosys, Sanofi, Epizyme Research funding: Roche, Epizyme, Beigene, Astrazeneca Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau—Roche, Astrazenca, Beigene, SeaGen, Abbvie, JNJ, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, Karyopharm, GSK, Morphosys, Sanofi, Epizyme; Travel, accommodation, expenses—F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Astrazenca, Beigene, SeaGen, Abbvie, JNJ, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, Karyopharm, GSK, Morphosys, Sanofi, Epizyme M. Tani Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, Kiowa-Kirin, Incyte J. Martinez-Lopez Employment or leadership position: Complutense University Consultant or advisory role: Janssen/BMS/Novartis/Roche/Pfizer/Sanofi Research funding: BMS/Roche/Asltellas Other remuneration: Speaker's Bureau—Janssen/BMS/Novartis/Roche/Pfizer/Sanofi; Travel, accommodation, expenses—Janssen/Gilead N. Bartlett Consultant or advisory role: Seattle Genetics, Roche/Genentech, ADC Therapeutics, BTG, Acerta Pharma, Foresight Diagnostics Research funding: Seattle Genetics, Merck, Forty Seven, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Millennium, ADC Therapeutics, Autolus, Roche/Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead/Kite Pharma A. Salar Research funding: Gilead, Roche, Abbvie Other remuneration: Speaker's bureau—BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, EusaPharma, Incyte, Janssen, Roche; Travel, accommodation, expenses—Janssen, Roche J. Brody Consultant or advisory role: Genentech, Merck, Kite/Gilead, SeaGen, ADC Therapeutics, Epizyme S. Leppä Consultant or advisory role: Genmab, GILEAD, Incyte, Novartis, Orion, Roche Honoraria: Gilead, Novartis Research funding: Bayer, Celgene, Genmab, Hutchmed, Novartis, Nordic Nanovector, Roche E. Mulvihill Employment or leadership position: Hoffmann-La Roche Stock ownership: Hoffmann-La Roche Other remuneration: Travel, accommodation, expenses—Hoffmann-La Roche L. Lundberg Employment or leadership position: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Stock ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Other remuneration: Patent—F. Hoffmann-La Roche J. Relf Employment or leadership position: Roche Products limited Stock ownership: Roche, F-Star Therapeutics and Harpoon Therapeutics Y. Xie Employment or leadership position: Roche A. Bottos Employment or leadership position: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Stock ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche K. Humphrey Employment or leadership position: Roche Stock ownership: Roche M. Hutchings Consultant or advisory role: Takeda, Roche, Genmab, Janssen, Abbvie Research funding: Celgene, Genmab, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Merck, Abbvie, AstraZeneca

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,255
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,377
Écart entre enseignants0,330 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHematological OncologyMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207