HISTORICAL PREMISES OF FORMATION OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE IN CONTEMPORARY AZERBAIJAN AT THE PERIOD FROM XIX TO BEGINNING OF XX CENTURY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
At the beginning of the 19th century began a new phase in the history of Azerbaijan. The conquest of this region solved the balance of power in the traditionally Russian-Turkish-Iranian standoff. Began a planned takeover and the Division of the historical territories of Azerbaijani lands along the Araz river resulting in the Northern Khanate was annexed to Russia, and southern remained a part of the Shah’s Iran. Since this period, the administrative structure, as well as the architecture and culture of separated territories, inhabited by a people gets a different development. In the first quarter of the 19th century in Northern Azerbaijan military authorities began topographic fixing of the existing settlements on the ground. The main architectural and construction activities were carried out by military engineers directly engaged in construction of fortifications and their preparations for defense. Thus arose Zagatala, Gakh, Gusar fortresses on the basis of which were later established the towns. To strengthen borders the Tsarist Government resettled here Christian peoples who created new settlements and characteristic itself cultural environment, which in turn was reflected in the regional architecture of 19th and beginning of 20th centuries. Important for the future development of settlements was the activity engineers, architects, scientists, historians, artists coming from Russia who had studied the situation of historical cities and buildings of the region. Self-made urbanistic plans, measurements of monuments, articles, recordings and drawings became important sources for further research in this area. It should be noted that during this period clearly manifest themselves formed for centuries and enriched with new technology traditions of architectural heritage. Original constructive schemes, design patterns, shapes and architectural and decorative elements of buildings, developed over the centuries due to the mined out experience skillfully preserved and applied in the construction of various character of buildings in the regions of Azerbaijan. National architectural trends had been clearly reflected in the works of the prominent Azerbaijani architects, architects and craftsmen who left deep traces in our heritage. Despite annexation of Azerbaijani lands and rigid colonial policies of Tsarism, the process of acceding of North Azerbaijan to Russia and also played historically progressive role in its development. The continuous internecine wars between khans ended and began abolished feudal division establishing of new economic and cultural development began. This period in the development of architecture and construction of the country, despite the difficult political circumstances, was the underlying cause for further economic growth and urban development of modern Azerbaijan. In the new socio-economic conditions broke the old principles of urban planning, new techniques for urban development, and new types of public, civil, industrial, and religious buildings revealed. With the growth and changing composition of the population there has been interference with traditional and new imported Western culture. The historical heritage of the period of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries, has today a great importance in the forming of architecture of the cities of modern Azerbaijan.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».