Long term follow‐up of untreated/relapsing MCL patients with the Ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax combination
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Backgrounds: Targeted therapies (such as Ibrutinib and Venetoclax) have improved Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) patients’ outcomes. OAsIs trial has evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the Ibrutinib Obinutuzumab plus venetoclax combination in both R/R and untreated MCL patients (NCT02558816, Le Gouill et al. Blood 2021). In the present work, we updated the outcome of patients enrolled in OASIS trial. Methods: The OASIS trial was a 3 arms multicenter prospective phase 1/2 trial. Arm A (n = 9) enrolled R/R patients who were treated with Obinutuzumab (Obi, 1000 mg) and Ibrutinib (Ibru, 560 mg). Patients in Arm B (R/R; n = 24) and C (newly diagnosed MCL; n = 15) were treated with Obi+Ibru+Venetoclax (Ven, 400 mg). Patients’ characteristics have been described in the original manuscript. Results: In cohorts A (n = 9) and B (n = 24), overall response rates were 89% and 71%, respectively. Median Follow-ups were 71.6 and 48m, the 4-y PFS were 67% and 50%, respectively. No safety signals appeared during long term FU. Patients who progressed were treated with Bendamustine-containing regimen (6 out of 10) and one patient received Odronextamab and anti-CD22xCD3 bispecific antibodies. For Cohort C (n = 15), the median follow-up was 46m (36, 49m). Median PFS and DOR were not reached, the estimated 48m-PFS and 36m-DOR were 80% (Figure 1A). Two patients prematurely discontinued, one early PD (after 4m) and one for Adverse Event (neuropathy after 9m). The early PD patient harbored no adverse event, especially no TP53 alteration. One patient with TP53 mutation is still experiencing long-term disease control. One patient experienced atrial fibrillation and one patient had acute cardiac failure. Regarding infections, one patient died of a progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after the completion of treatment. Two patients prematurely discontinued the treatment, one patient had a PD at C4 and has subsequently been treated with R-CHOP, one patient relapsed after treatment completion and has been treated with Glofitamab. In all, 2 patients progressed and 1 died in arm C (PML), hence, the 4-y OS is estimated to be 93% (Figure 1B). Encore Abstract - previously submitted to EHA 2023 The research was funded by: Roche SAS supplied obinutuzumab, Janssen-Cilag supplied ibrutinib and AbbVie supplied venetoclax. Roche SAS, Janssen-Cilag and AbbVie funded the trial Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, combination therapies, targeting the tumor microenvironment Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. S. Rule Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».