Notice bibliographique
Résumé
My close connections with William Kirby's Le Chien d'or began many decades ago, in a way even before I was born.In 1911 my mother emigrated with her family from London, England, to St. Thomas, Ontario.She attended high school in that county town in the 1920s, a time when Canadians were especially proud of their country because of its role in World War One, in which her father and her two older brothers served.At the St. Thomas Collegiate Institute and Vocational School she not only learned a good deal about her adopted homeland, but she also read the fiction and poetry of many Canadian authors, including Kirby's majestic historical novel.I do not know which version of Le Chien d'or formed part of my mother's syllabus-in the 1920s there were at least four versions available, including two that were published by the Musson Book Company, Limited, of Toronto.I do know that she loved this novel very much, that at one time or another there were several copies around our house, that she re-read it in all or in part at least once a year until she died, and that she passed her enthusiasm for it on to her daughter.It is not really surprising, therefore, that when, aged nine or ten, I visited the old city of Quebec on a school excursion from Montreal, the site that impressed me most was not the Plains of Abraham, but the tablet of the Golden Dog with which Kirby's novel was so closely associated.Many years passed, however, before I became professionally involved with this tablet over the principal entrance to the main post office in Quebec, the traditions attached to its legend, and the work of prose fiction that Kirby composed about it.By then I had received an MA in Canadian literature from Queen's University (Kingston, Ontario).I had earned my doctorate at the University of Toronto with a thesis on nineteenth-century English-and French-Canadian fiction.I had taught Canadian Literature at the University of British Columbia and at Carleton University.And I had recognized three problems that pertained in particular to early Canadian literature in both English and French.Many important works were not in print.Many of those that were available represented a version that was xiii
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,235 | 0,133 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».