RECONSTRUCTION OF APPLICATION FOR MARRIAGE DISPENSATION REGULATION IN RELIGIOUS COURT BASED ON ISLAMIC JUSTICE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Marriage dispensation is the granting of a marriage license by a court to prospective husbands and wives who are not yet 19 years old to come into a marriage and must be based on the agreement of both prospective bride and groom. The application for dispensation from marriage for those who have not reached the age of 19 for the prospective husband and wife is submitted by both male and female parents to the Religious Court in the area where they live. After the issuance of Law Number 16 of 2019 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019, the marriage age limit was changed to 19 years for both parties from 16 years to 19 years. However, after the increase in the age limit for dispensation for marriage, the number of applications for dispensation for marriage has increased. This of course raises differences of opinion among law enforcers. The focus of this research is 1). Why is the regulation on requests for marriage dispensation in religious courts not based on Islamic justice? 2). What are the current weaknesses in the Marriage Dispensation Application Regulations in the Religious Courts? 3). How is the Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Application Regulations in Religious Courts Based on Islamic Justice? The aims of this research are (1). to analyze and find regulations on requests for dispensation from marriage in religious courts that do not yet have the value of Islamic justice. (2). to analyze and find weaknesses in the regulation of requests for marriage dispensation in the current religious courts (3). to find the reconstruction of regulations on requests for dispensation from marriage to religious courts that do not yet have the value of Islamic justice. Paradigm This research uses a constructivism paradigm, with a social legal research approach that uses primary data. Methods of data collection using interviews, observation, and field systems. The legal theory used in this dissertation is the theory of Islamic justice as a Grand Theory, Middle Theory of legal system theory and Applied theory of Progressive legal theory. The results of this dissertation research found that the regulation on requests for dispensation from marriage in the religious courts has not yet had the value of Islamic justice, namely the normalization of the marriage law Article 7 and Perma No. 5 of 2019 Article 2 and Article 14 have not provided the values of justice that are able to realize the nature of marriage, namely forming a family that is Sakinah, mawadah, wa rahmah, or eternal based on the orders of Allah SWT. The current weaknesses in the regulation on requests for dispensation from marriage in the religious courts are weaknesses in legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. Therefore, with regulations on requests for dispensation from marriage in religious courts that do not yet have the value of Islamic justice, it is necessary to reconstruct the provisions in Article 7 of Law Number 16 of 2019 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 Article 2 and Article 14. Keywords : Marriage Dispensation; Reconstruction; Justice; Petition; Court DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/132-07 Publication date: May 31 st 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».