MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380364058 · doi:10.1353/vic.2010.a391654

Holman Hunt and the Pre-Raphaelite Vision (review)

2010· article· en· W4380364058 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pamela Fletcher

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionPrintmakingVisual artsPaintingArt historyThe artsHollywoodArtHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Holman Hunt and the Pre-Raphaelite Vision Pamela Fletcher (bio) Holman Hunt and the Pre-Raphaelite Vision, edited by Katharine Lochnan and Carol Jacobi; pp. 224. New Haven and London: The Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto, and Yale University Press, 2008, $75.00, £40.00. This handsomely produced volume is the published companion to the recent exhibition of William Holman Hunt’s work at the Manchester Art Gallery, the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO) in Toronto, and the Minneapolis Institute of Arts. While it contains full color reproductions of the works in the exhibition, it is not a traditional exhibition catalog with individual entries on each object. Instead, the images are interspersed between the pages of the ten substantial essays that make up the book. This format was most likely dictated by the recent publication of Judith Bronkhurst’s William Holman Hunt: A Catalogue Raisonné (2006), which does the work of documenting and reproducing the oil paintings, watercolors, and drawings Hunt produced over his long career. The organizers took advantage of this freedom to commission essays from a wide range of specialists examining various aspects of Hunt’s practice, from Linda Parry’s essay on his interest in textiles to Brenda Rix’s discussion of his work as a printmaker. This wide range is both the book’s strength and perhaps a slight weakness. By situating Hunt within a number of different historical contexts, the essays deliver many new insights about his work, but the book, despite its obvious visual appeal and generalist title, is not the best place for those new to his work to look for an introduction to it. As the essays take up diverse aspects of Hunt’s career, two major themes emerge. One is the construction of what Matthew Teitelbaum, director of the AGO, calls a “Holman Hunt for the twenty-first century” (9), by focusing on Hunt’s interest in [End Page 476] questions of continued relevance, such as the relationship between religious faith, politics and science, and the politics of the Middle East. Jonathan Mane-Wheoki’s essay on The Light of the World (1851–52), perhaps Hunt’s most well-known composition, locates the image within the context of late-nineteenth-century theological debates and Hunt’s own religious beliefs. The essay concludes by following the painted “replica” on its early twentieth-century tour of the colonies and dominions of the British Empire, including an overview of the multiple media into which the image was translated, including stained glass windows, Sunday-school and Bible-class cards, sculpture, and even a parade float. In this fascinating case study in the circulation of images through different contexts, Mane-Wheoki demonstrates how the work became both a devotional image and an icon of British imperialism. In a similar vein, Nicholas Tromans’s essay examines Hunt’s art, writings, and political activism in light of Middle Eastern politics, particularly surrounding the debates over the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Tromans makes the important point that by bringing the exactitude of Pre-Raphaelite vision to the contested landscape of the Middle East, Hunt quite specifically locates paintings such as The Scapegoat (1854–55) “within the context of the Palestine of the 1850s” (139). This insight leads to fascinating interpretations of individual paintings, such as Hunt’s watercolor of the landscape immediately outside the walls of Jerusalem, The Plains of Rephaim from Mount Zion (1855). Tromans suggests this work should be read in light of the controversial expansion of the city at mid-century, interpreting the small anecdote of the man and children seemingly being chased out of the countryside by some youths as an anticipation of the tensions over land ownership that accompanied the development of the city. The essays also make a point of focusing on lesser-known parts of Hunt’s career, thus disrupting the conventional picture of Hunt as the one Pre-Raphaelite painter who never strayed from the cause (a stereotype Hunt arguably created himself in his autobiography). Carol Jacobi’s essay on the period between 1858 and 1868 is exemplary in this regard. During this decade Hunt turned away from the narrative and religious subjects that had dominated...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian StudiesMême sujetHistorical Art and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207