#3032 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VOCLOSPORIN IN PATIENTS WITH PROTEINURIA ≥2 MG/MG: AN INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF THE AURA-LV AND AURORA 1 STUDIES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims Proteinuria has been established as a mediator of progressive renal damage in many nephropathies. However, recent studies of several monoclonal antibodies demonstrated a lack of efficacy in patients with lupus nephritis and moderate to high levels of proteinuria (UPCR ≥2 to ≥3 mg/mg), potentially due to an increase in renal antibody clearance.1-4 Given that, we examined the efficacy and safety of voclosporin in patients with lupus nephritis and a UPCR of ≥2 mg/mg using the pooled dataset from the Phase 2 AURA-LV and Phase 3 AURORA 1 trials. Method Both studies enrolled patients with biopsy-proven LN (Class III, IV, or V ± III/IV, biopsied within 6 months in AURA-LV or up to 2 years in AURORA 1) and proteinuria ≥1.5 mg/mg (≥2 mg/mg for Class V). Patients were randomized to receive either voclosporin (23.7 mg BID) or placebo and treated for up to one year (48 weeks [AURA-LV], 52 weeks [AURORA 1]); all patients received MMF and low-dose steroids. For this post-hoc analysis, changes in UPCR and renal response rates were evaluated in patients with baseline UPCR ≥2 mg/mg. Complete renal response (CRR) was defined as UPCR ≤0.5 mg/mg with stable renal function, low-dose steroids, and no rescue medication; partial renal response (PRR) was defined as a ≥50% reduction in UPCR from baseline. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Results The pooled analysis included 268 and 266 patients in the voclosporin and control arms, respectively. Of those, 217 and 215 patients had UPCR ≥2 mg/mg (baseline mean [SD], 5.2 [3.4] vs. 4.6 [2.9] mg/mg, respectively). A significantly greater percentage of voclosporin-treated patients achieved a CRR at one year compared to the control arm (41.0% vs. 21.9%; odds ratio [OR] 2.48, p<0.0001, Figure 1A). Similarly, significantly more patients in the voclosporin arm (69.6%) than control arm (50.0%) achieved a PRR at the same time point (OR 2.3, p<0.0001); this endpoint was met significantly earlier in voclosporin-treated patients as well (29 vs. 57 days, hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, p<0.0001). The median time to UPCR ≤0.5 mg/mg was also significantly earlier in the voclosporin arm (211 days); less than 50% of the control arm achieved this endpoint within the study period (OR 1.9, p<0.0001, Figure 1B). Adverse event rates were comparable in both arms (Table 1), and mean eGFR levels were similar and stable over the study period, a trend that was maintained for AURORA 1 patients who continued randomized treatment for another two years in the AURORA 2 study. Conclusion Consistent with results from the overall pooled study population, patients with UPCR ≥2 mg/mg at baseline treated with voclosporin achieved significantly higher renal response rates and significantly earlier reductions in UPCR than patients treated with MMF and low-dose steroids alone. These findings are clinically important given the lack of effective therapies available for patients with high baseline proteinuria.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».