3D Immersed Boundary Methods for the Calculations of Droplet Trajectories towards Icing Application
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The in-flight ice accretion simulations are typically performed using a quasi-steady formulation through a multi-step approach. As the ice grows, the geometry changes, and an adaptation of the fluid volume mesh used by the airflow and droplet-trajectory solver is required. Re-meshing or mesh deformation are generally employed to do that. The geometries formed are often complex ice shapes increasing the difficulty of the re-meshing process, especially in three-dimensional simulations. Consequently, difficulties are encountered when trying to automate the process. Contrary to the usual body-fitted mesh approach, the use of immersed boundary methods (IBMs) allows solving, or greatly reducing, this problem by removing the mesh update, facilitating the global automation of the simulation. In the following paper, an approach to perform the airflow and droplet trajectory calculations for three-dimensional simulations is presented. This framework utilizes only immersed boundary methods. In particular, two methods are presented. On the one hand, a ghost-cell Immersed Boundary approach has been developed to solve the aerodynamics. The Euler equations are solved at fluid points, whereas the solution is forced in the vicinity of the obstacle at some particular cells (IB target points), in order to mimic a slip boundary condition. Special attention has been given to the applied boundary conditions as well as to the location of these IB target points. In fact, instead of the most commonly used approaches where the IB target points are placed in the solid or in the fluid, the case where these IB target points lie astride the obstacle (namely “GC Surrounding” in the following), in the fluid and solid regions, is studied. On the other hand, to solve the droplet trajectory equations, the penalization method, already present in IGLOO2D (the 2D ice accretion suite developed at ONERA), has been expanded to the three-dimensional simulations. The two immersed boundary methods are compared and numerically tested on different cases. First, a mesh refinement study is performed for weakly compressible flow around a cylinder. In this case, the solution is compared with that obtained using a body-fitted simulation and it serves as a verification of the method. Next, the approach is used in two other different cases. The first case involves an iced GLC305 airfoil, which is characterized by its complex geometry, under compressible subsonic conditions. The second case is a three-dimensional simulation in which the presented approach is used to analyze the weakly compressible flow around a sphere.</div></div>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».