<i>Concepts of the World: The French Avant-Garde and the Idea of the International, 1910–1940</i> . By Effie Rentzou <i>Concepts of the World: The French Avant-Garde and the Idea of the International, 1910–1940</i> . By RentzouEffie. (FlashPoints.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2022. vii + 394 pp., ill.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How did avant-garde artists in France — a nation at the forefront of capitalist and imperialist growth — conceive of the world in an era of rapid capitalist globalization, of ideologies justifying colonial invasion with claims of western superiority, and of an unstable political climate fed by war and fascism? In her highly engaging and meticulously researched work, Effie Rentzou deconstructs the relationship between the avant-garde and globalization, recasting it as ambivalent and complex, thereby challenging the longstanding account of modernity’s unhesitant ideological alignment with the forces of globalization. Drawing on rich examples of the diverse literary and visual production of the French avant-garde, from polemical texts to poetry, to periodicals and exhibitions, Rentzou illuminates the duality that characterizes the political language of this movement. Oscillating between apprehension and jubilation, the language of the avant-garde is situated in both a resistance to and embrace of globalization; it is from this irresolute position that the artists of the avant-garde construct the world. The book is divided into five chapters. The first investigates the role of the nation in the pre- and post-war avant-garde and posits Paris as its insecure ‘centre’. Rentzou demonstrates how the avant-garde undermined the stability of the centre–periphery model, examining in particular the work of Guillaume Apollinaire, who both reinforced the notion of French supremacy and subverted the authority of the nation. The second chapter studies what Rentzou refers to as the ‘messy internationalism’ of Dada as she ties this movement’s lack of centralization to the practices of anarchist internationalism. Dada, as Rentzou astutely illustrates, is its magazines, which harbour a conglomeration of social and artistic networks, reinforcing — as exemplified in Francis Picabia’s group portraits — Dada’s disparate internationalism in which the parts, together, do not cohere into a whole. Chapter 3 focuses on the avant-garde’s ‘cosmopolitan peasants’ and their embracing of a foreign, broken French in which error represents a structural method used to ‘create multiple positionings within and through language’ (p. 216). Criticizing the morals of French bourgeois society, Picabia reappropriated the negative characteristics associated with the cosmopolitan, and Louis Aragon the national attributes of the peasant, to reinscribe these figures in anti-nationalism. Chapter 4 examines the surrealists’ fusion of aesthetics and politics in the sumptuous periodical Minotaure (1933–39), which created an alternative universalism through the materiality of the body. Rejecting Greek humanism and corporeal ideals, the surrealists embraced the monstruous body, incarnated by the figure of the minotaur, as a universal body that privileges multiplicity. The final chapter analyses how the surrealists utilized their 1938 Parisian exhibition to critique bourgeois society from within its own institutions: held at Georges Wildenstein’s prestigious Galerie des Beaux-Arts, the exhibition represented the world as a city that is created by, and simultaneously creates, the specifically female body. It aimed to unmask the simulacra of capitalist internationalism by revealing a dynamic vision of the world in which community is prioritized over hierarchy. The conclusion underscores the avant-garde’s rethinking of the world as the rethinking of the human. This book represents a valuable contribution to avant-garde studies and reminds us that, in our own tumultuous times, it is all the more urgent that we dare to recreate the world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».